Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30858410›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Signs of biological activities of 28,000-year-old mammoth nuclei in mouse oocytes visualized by live-cell imaging.

Kazuo Yamagata, Kouhei Nagai, Hiroshi Miyamoto, Masayuki Anzai, Hiromi Kato, Kei Miyamoto, Satoshi Kurosaka, Rika Azuma, Igor I Kolodeznikov, Albert V Protopopov and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Can Humanity Thrive Beyond the Galaxy?The Journal of reproduction and development · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Kazuo YamagataGraduate School of Biology-Oriented Science and Technology, Kindai University, Wakayama, 649-6493, Japan.
Kouhei NagaiGraduate School of Biology-Oriented Science and Technology, Kindai University, Wakayama, 649-6493, Japan.
Hiroshi MiyamotoGraduate School of Biology-Oriented Science and Technology, Kindai University, Wakayama, 649-6493, Japan.
Masayuki AnzaiInstitute of Advanced Technology, Kindai University, Wakayama, 642-0017, Japan.
Hiromi KatoInstitute of Advanced Technology, Kindai University, Wakayama, 642-0017, Japan.
Kei MiyamotoGraduate School of Biology-Oriented Science and Technology, Kindai University, Wakayama, 649-6493, Japan.
Satoshi KurosakaInstitute of Advanced Technology, Kindai University, Wakayama, 642-0017, Japan.
Rika AzumaGraduate School of Biology-Oriented Science and Technology, Kindai University, Wakayama, 649-6493, Japan.
Igor I KolodeznikovDepartment of Mammoth Faunal Studies, Sakha (Yakutia) Republic Academy of the Sciences, Yakutsk, 677077, Russia.
Albert V ProtopopovDepartment of Mammoth Faunal Studies, Sakha (Yakutia) Republic Academy of the Sciences, Yakutsk, 677077, Russia.
Valerii V PlotnikovDepartment of Mammoth Faunal Studies, Sakha (Yakutia) Republic Academy of the Sciences, Yakutsk, 677077, Russia.
Hisato KobayashiNODAI Genome Research Center, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo, 156-8502, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3800-4691
Ryouka Kawahara-MikiNODAI Genome Research Center, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo, 156-8502, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2072-8851
Tomohiro KonoNODAI Genome Research Center, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo, 156-8502, Japan.
Masao UchidaNational Institute for Environmental Studies, Ibaraki, 305-8506, Japan.
Yasuyuki ShibataNational Institute for Environmental Studies, Ibaraki, 305-8506, Japan.
Tetsuya HandaInstitute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Kanagawa, 226-8503, Japan.
Hiroshi KimuraInstitute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Kanagawa, 226-8503, Japan.
Yoshihiko HosoiGraduate School of Biology-Oriented Science and Technology, Kindai University, Wakayama, 649-6493, Japan.
Tasuku MitaniGraduate School of Biology-Oriented Science and Technology, Kindai University, Wakayama, 649-6493, Japan.
Kazuya MatsumotoGraduate School of Biology-Oriented Science and Technology, Kindai University, Wakayama, 649-6493, Japan.
Akira IritaniInstitute of Advanced Technology, Kindai University, Wakayama, 642-0017, Japan. iritani@waka.kindai.ac.jp.
Kindai University · JPAcademy of Sciences of the Republic of Sakha · RUTokyo University of Agriculture · JPNational Institute for Environmental Studies · JPTokyo Institute of Technology · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 28,000-year-old remains of a woolly mammoth, named 'Yuka', were found in Siberian permafrost. Here we recovered the less-damaged nucleus-like structures from the remains and visualised their dynamics in living mouse oocytes after nuclear transfer. Proteomic analyses demonstrated the presence of nuclear components in the remains. Nucleus-like structures found in the tissue homogenate were histone- and lamin-positive by immunostaining. In the reconstructed oocytes, the mammoth nuclei showed the spindle assembly, histone incorporation and partial nuclear formation; however, the full activation of nuclei for cleavage was not confirmed. DNA damage levels, which varied among the nuclei, were comparable to those of frozen-thawed mouse sperm and were reduced in some reconstructed oocytes. Our work provides a platform to evaluate the biological activities of nuclei in extinct animal species.

Indexed as

ProteomicsAnimalsCell NucleusFemaleFossilsMaleMammothsMiceNuclear Transfer TechniquesOocytes

Identifiers

PMID30858410
PMCPMC6411884
OpenAlexW2921676028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.