Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30858258›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine2019

Primary Care Clinician Adherence to Specialist Advice in Electronic Consultation.

Gwen de Man, Isabella Moroz, Jay Mercer, Erin Keely, Clare Liddy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Formalizing the curbside: digitally enhancing access to specialty care.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gwen de ManCT Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Isabella MorozCT Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Jay MercerDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Erin KeelyDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Clare LiddyCT Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada cliddy@bruyere.org.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeElectronic consultation (eConsult) services can improve access to specialist advice. Little is known, however, about whether and how often primary care clinicians adhere to the advice they receive. We evaluated how primary care clinicians use recommendations conveyed by specialists via the Champlain BASE (Building Access to Specialists through eConsultation) eConsult service and how eConsult affects clinical management of patients in primary care.

methodsThis is a descriptive analysis based on a retrospective chart audit of 291 eConsults done between January 20, 2017 and August 31, 2017 at the Bruyère Family Health Team, located in Ottawa, Canada. Patients' charts were reviewed until 6 months after specialist response for the following main outcomes: implementation of specialist advice by primary care clinicians, communication of the results to the patients, method, and time frame of communication.

resultsPrimary care clinicians adhered to specialist advice in 82% of cases. Adherence ranged from 62% to 93% across recommendation categories. Questions asked by primary care clinicians related to diagnosis (63%), management (27%), drug treatment (10%), and procedures (1%). Recommendations of the eConsult were communicated to patients in 79% of cases, most often by face-to-face visit (38%), telephone call (32%), or use of the patient portal (9%). Communication occurred in a median of 5 days.

conclusionsWe found little evidence of barriers to implementing specialist advice with use of eConsult, which suggests recommendations given through service were actionable. With a high primary care clinician adherence to specialist recommendations and primary care clinician-to-patient communication, we conclude that eConsult delivers good-quality care and improves patient management.

Indexed as

CommunicationCooperative BehaviorNurse PractitionersPhysician-Patient RelationsPhysicians, FamilyRemote ConsultationAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleaccess to carecommunicationcoordination of caredecision makingdelivery of health careeConsulthealth informaticsintegratedpractice-based researchprimary care clinician adherenceprofessional practice

Identifiers

PMID30858258
PMCPMC6411398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.