Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30858254›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine2019

Trends in Providing Out-of-Office, Urgent After-Hours, and On-Call Care in British Columbia.

Lindsay Hedden, M Ruth Lavergne, Kimberlyn M McGrail, Michael R Law, Ivy L Bourgeault, Rita McCracken, Morris L Barer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lindsay HeddenCentre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Research Pavilion, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada lindsay.hedden@ubc.ca.
M Ruth LavergneFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Kimberlyn M McGrailCentre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Michael R LawCentre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Ivy L BourgeaultTelfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Rita McCrackenDepartment of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Morris L BarerCentre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProviding care in alternative (non-office) locations and outside office hours are important elements of access and comprehensiveness of primary care. We examined the trends in and determinants of the services provided in a cohort of primary care physicians in British Columbia, Canada.

methodsWe used physician-level payments for all primary care physicians practicing in British Columbia from 2006-2007 through 2011-2012. We examined the association between physician demographics and practice characteristics and payment for care in alternative locations and after hours across rural, urban, and metropolitan areas using longitudinal mixed-effects models.

resultsThe proportion of physicians who provided care in alternative locations and after hours declined significantly during the period, in rural, urban, and metropolitan practices. Declines ranged from 5% for long-term care facility visits to 22% for after-hours care. Female physicians, and those in the oldest age category, had lower odds of providing care at alternative locations and for urgent after-hours care. Compared with those practicing in metropolitan centers, physicians working in rural areas had significantly higher odds of providing care both in alternative locations and after hours.

conclusionCare provided in non-office locations and after office hours declined significantly during the study period. Jurisdictions where providing these services are not mandated, and where similar workforce demographic shifts are occurring, may experience similar accessibility challenges.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalPhysicians, Primary CareResidential FacilitiesAdultAfter-Hours CareAgedAmbulatory CareBritish ColumbiaFee-for-Service PlansFemaleHouse CallsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health Careafter-hours careBritish Columbiacohort studiesphysiciansprimary careprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID30858254
PMCPMC6411390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.