Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30858234›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2019

Genetics of Variable Disease Expression Conferred by Inverse Gene-For-Gene Interactions in the Wheat-

Amanda R Peters Haugrud, Zengcui Zhang, Jonathan K Richards, Timothy L Friesen, Justin D Faris

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Identification of septoria nodorum blotch susceptibility genes in hard winter wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genome-wide association mapping of septoria nodorum blotch resistance in Nordic winter and spring wheat collections.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda R Peters HaugrudDepartment of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota 58102.
Zengcui ZhangUnited States Department of Agriculture-Agriculture Research Service, Cereal Crops Research Unit, Eduard T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center, Fargo, North Dakota 58102.
Jonathan K RichardsDepartment of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota 58102.
Timothy L FriesenUnited States Department of Agriculture-Agriculture Research Service, Cereal Crops Research Unit, Eduard T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center, Fargo, North Dakota 58102.ORCID 0000-0001-5634-2200
Justin D FarisUnited States Department of Agriculture-Agriculture Research Service, Cereal Crops Research Unit, Eduard T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center, Fargo, North Dakota 58102 justin.faris@ars.usda.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-9653-3287
United States Department of Agriculture · USNorth Dakota State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The wheat-

Indexed as

AscomycotaChromosome MappingEpistasis, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, FungalGene Knockout TechniquesHost-Pathogen InteractionsMycotoxinsPlant DiseasesPlant ProteinsPromoter Regions, GeneticQuantitative Trait LociTriticumMycotoxinsPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30858234
PMCPMC6501074
OpenAlexW2921033350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.