Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30857609›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of anaesthesia2019

Dexamethasone as an adjuvant for peripheral nerve blockade: a randomised, triple-blinded crossover study in volunteers.

Peter Marhofer, Malachy Columb, Phil M Hopkins, Manfred Greher, Daniela Marhofer, Max Bienzle, Markus Zeitlinger

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of anaesthesia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. [Intravenous dexamethasone enhances efficacy of brachial plexus blockNan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter MarhoferDepartment of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: peter.marhofer@meduniwien.ac.at.
Malachy ColumbDepartment of Anaesthesia, Manchester University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Wythenshawe, UK.
Phil M HopkinsLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Manfred GreherDepartment of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Herz Jesu Hospital Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Daniela MarhoferDepartment of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Max BienzleDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Markus ZeitlingerDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATHerz-Jesu KrankenhausSt James's University Hospital · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe efficacy of dexamethasone in extending the duration of local anaesthetic block is uncertain. In a randomised controlled triple blind crossover study in volunteers, we tested the hypothesis that neither i.v. nor perineurally administered dexamethasone prolongs the sensory block achieved with ropivacaine.

methodsUltrasound-guided ulnar nerve blocks (ropivacaine 0.75% wt/vol, 3 ml, with saline 1 ml with or without dexamethasone 4 mg) were performed on three occasions in 24 male volunteers along with an i.v. injection of saline 1 ml with or without dexamethasone 4 mg. The combinations of saline and dexamethasone were as follows: control group, perineural and i.v. saline; perineural group, perineural dexamethasone and i.v. saline; i.v. group, perineural saline and i.v. dexamethasone. Sensory block was measured using a VAS in response to pinprick testing. The duration of sensory block was the primary outcome and time to onset of sensory block the secondary outcome.

resultsAll 24 subjects completed the trial. The median [inter-quartile range (IQR)] duration of sensory block was 6.87 (5.85-7.62) h in the control group, 7.37 (5.78-7.93) h in the perineural group and 7.37 (6.10-7.97) h in the i.v. group (P=0.61). There was also no significant difference in block onset time between the three groups.

conclusionDexamethasone 4 mg has no clinically relevant effect on the duration of sensory block provided by ropivacaine applied to the ulnar nerve. CLINICAL

trial registrationDRKS, 00014604; EudraCT, 2018-001221-98.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, AnesthesiaAdolescentAdultAnesthetics, LocalCross-Over StudiesDexamethasoneDouble-Blind MethodHumansMaleMiddle AgedNerve BlockRopivacaineTime FactorsUlnar NerveUltrasonography, InterventionalYoung AdultAdjuvants, AnesthesiaAnesthetics, LocalDexamethasoneRopivacainedexamethasonelocal anaestheticsregional anaesthesiaropivacaineulnar nerve blockultrasound-guided

Identifiers

PMID30857609
PMCPMC6435911
OpenAlexW2911520912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.