Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30857606›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of anaesthesia2019

Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative: infection and sepsis.

Jonathan Barnes, Jennifer Hunter, Steve Harris, Manu Shankar-Hari, Elisabeth Diouf, Ib Jammer, Cor Kalkman, Andrew A Klein, Tomas Corcoran, Stefan Dieleman and 3 more

Abstract readConsensus StatementSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of anaesthesia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Peri-Operative Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Modulates CD4Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jonathan BarnesDepartment of Anaesthesia, Great Western Hospital, Swindon, UK.
Jennifer HunterDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University College Hospital, London, UK.
Steve HarrisBloomsbury Institute of Intensive Care Medicine, University College London Hospital, London, UK. Electronic address: doc@steveharris.me.
Manu Shankar-HariSchool of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, Kings College London, UK; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Elisabeth DioufAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Le Dantec Hospital, Cheikh Anta DIOP University, Dakar, Senegal.
Ib JammerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Cor KalkmanDivision of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Andrew A KleinDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Tomas CorcoranDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia; School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Stefan DielemanDepartment of Anaesthesia & Perioperative Medicine Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Michael P W GrocottAnaesthesia and Critical Care Research Group, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, UK; Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; Department of Anaesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Michael G MythenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University College Hospital, London, UK; National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
StEP-COMPAC group

Funding

Department of Health 16/33/01Department of Health CS-2016-16-011Department of Health DRF-2015-08-023Department of Health EME/16/33/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerioperative infection and sepsis are of fundamental concern to perioperative clinicians. However, standardised endpoints are either poorly defined or not routinely implemented. The Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative was established to derive a set of standardised endpoints for use in perioperative clinical trials.

methodsWe undertook a systematic review to identify measures of infection and sepsis used in the perioperative literature. A multi-round Delphi consensus process that included more than 60 clinician researchers was then used to refine a recommended list of outcome measures.

resultsA literature search yielded 1857 titles of which 255 met inclusion criteria for endpoint extraction. A long list of endpoints, with definitions and timescales, was generated and those potentially relevant to infection and sepsis circulated to the theme subgroup and then the wider StEP-COMPAC working group, undergoing a three-stage Delphi process. The response rates for Delphi rounds 1, 3, and 3 were 89% (n=8), 67% (n=62), and 80% (n=8), respectively. A set of 13 endpoints including fever, surgical site, and organ-specific infections as defined by the US Centres for Disease Control and Sepsis-3 are proposed for future use.

conclusionsWe defined a consensus list of standardised endpoints related to infection and sepsis for perioperative trials using an established and rigorous approach. Each endpoint was evaluated with respect to validity, reliability, feasibility, and patient centredness. One or more of these should be considered for inclusion in future perioperative clinical trials assessing infection, sepsis, or both, thereby permitting synthesis and comparison of future results.

Indexed as

Delphi TechniqueEndpoint DeterminationHumansInfectionsPerioperative CareRespiratory Tract InfectionsSepsisSurgical Wound Infectioncore outcome measuresinfectionperioperative medicinepostoperative outcomesepsisstandardised endpointssurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID30857606
PMCPMC6435904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.