ArticleSystematic reviews2019
Editorial: Systematic review automation thematic series.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Toxic effects of nanomaterials for health applications: How automation can support a systematic review of the literature?Journal of applied toxicology : JAT · 2022Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence Resources for the Screening of Titles and Abstracts in Systematic Reviews: A Scoping Review.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2026Review
- Using full agreement across multiple large language models for title-and-abstract screening in systematic reviews: a proof-of-concept.Systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Performance of active learning models for screening prioritization in systematic reviews: a simulation study into the Average Time to Discover relevant records.Systematic reviews · 2023Article
- Usefulness of machine learning softwares to screen titles of systematic reviews: a methodological study.Systematic reviews · 2023Article
- A new taxonomy was developed for overlap across 'overviews of systematic reviews': A meta-research study of research waste.Research synthesis methods · 2022Article
- Research Screener: a machine learning tool to semi-automate abstract screening for systematic reviews.Systematic reviews · 2021Article
- Towards automating systematic reviews on immunization using an advanced natural language processing-based extraction system.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2020Article
- Machine learning for screening prioritization in systematic reviews: comparative performance of Abstrackr and EPPI-Reviewer.Systematic reviews · 2020Article
- Scoping Reviews, Systematic Reviews, and Meta-Analysis: Applications in Veterinary Medicine.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020Article
- The Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR): descriptive characteristics of publicly available data and opportunities for research.Systematic reviews · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.