Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30857518›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2019

Combination of lymphovascular invasion and the AJCC TNM staging system improves prediction of prognosis in N0 stage gastric cancer: results from a high-volume institution.

Jun Lu, Yun Dai, Jian-Wei Xie, Jia-Bin Wang, Jian-Xian Lin, Qi-Yue Chen, Long-Long Cao, Mi Lin, Ru-Hong Tu, Chao-Hui Zheng and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced CT predicts lymphovascular invasion and disease outcome in gastric cancer: a preliminary study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jun LuDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China.
Yun DaiDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China.
Jian-Wei XieDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China.
Jia-Bin WangDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China.
Jian-Xian LinDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China.
Qi-Yue ChenDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China.
Long-Long CaoDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China.
Mi LinDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China.
Ru-Hong TuDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China.
Chao-Hui ZhengDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China. wwkzch@163.com.
Ping LiDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China. pingli811002@163.com.
Chang-Ming HuangDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China. hcmlr2002@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0019-885X

Funding

Construction Project of Fujian Province Minimally Invasive Medical Center No. [2017]171QIHANG funds of Fujian Medical University No.2016QH025Scientific and technological innovation joint capital projects of Fujian Province 2016Y9031The second batch of special support funds for Fujian Province innovation and entrepreneurship talents (2016B013Youth scientific research subject of Fujian provincial health and family planning commission No. 2015-1-37
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study sought to explore whether lymphovascular invasion can affect the prognosis of patients with stage N0 gastric cancer and to evaluate the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for such patients.

methodFrom January 2006 to December 2011, a total of 2102 gastric cancer patients undergoing radical gastric resection were enrolled in this study. Homogeneity, discriminatory ability, and monotonicity of gradients in the combination of lymphovascular invasion and the 8th edition of the AJCC staging system and the 8th edition of the AJCC staging system alone were compared using linear trend χ2, likelihood ratio χ2 statistics, and Akaike information criterion (AIC) calculations. The Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test were used to analyze between-group differences in survival rate.

resultThe median follow-up time of the whole group was 58 months, and the average age of the whole group was 63.9 years (range 21-89 years). The 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates in N0 patients with lymphovascular invasion were lower than those in N0 patients without lymphovascular invasion (3-year OS: 78.3% vs 92.5%, 5-year OS: 70.0% vs 88.3%, p < 0.001). A multivariate analysis showed that age (p < 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (p < 0.001), and pT (p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for the prognosis of N0 patients. Compared with the 8th edition of the AJCC staging system alone, the 8th AJCC staging system combined with lymphovascular invasion demonstrated a better linear trend χ2, likelihood ratio χ2 statistics, and AIC value (68.99 vs 58.58, 70.18 vs 58.36, 1473.38 vs 1485.04). In pT3N0M0 patients with lymphovascular invasion, the 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates of the adjuvant chemotherapy group were higher than those of the surgery alone group (3-year OS: 83.3% vs 68.2%, 5-year OS: 72.3% vs 50.0%, p = 0.048).

conclusionLymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in N0 patients. The 8th AJCC staging system combined with lymphovascular invasion can improve the accuracy of the AJCC staging system for N0 patients. Moreover, adjuvant chemotherapy improves the survival of pT3N0M0 patients with lymphovascular invasion.

Indexed as

Hospital Bed Capacity, 500 and overAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsSurvival RateChemotherapy benefitGastric cancerLymphovascular invasionSurvival

Identifiers

PMID30857518
PMCPMC6413460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.