ReviewAnnual review of neuroscience2019
Probing Computation in the Primate Visual System at Single-Cone Resolution.
Review in Annual review of neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metabolic regulation of visual acuity.Science advances · 2025Article
- Review
- MFN1 augmentation prevents retinal degeneration in a Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 2A mouse model.iScience · 2023Article
- Sensitivity of the Dorsal-Central Retinal Pigment Epithelium to Sodium Iodate-Induced Damage Is Associated With Overlying M-Cone Photoreceptors in Mice.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022Article
- Early-stage visual perception impairment in schizophrenia, bottom-up and back again.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022Review
- Retinal ganglion cells projecting to superior colliculus and pulvinar in marmoset.Brain structure & function · 2021Article
- Dissecting cascade computational components in spiking neural networks.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Retinal Ganglion Cells-Diversity of Cell Types and Clinical Relevance.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Review
- An update on retinal prostheses.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020Review
- Color, Pattern, and the Retinal Cone Mosaic.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2019Article
- Reconciling Color Vision Models With Midget Ganglion Cell Receptive Fields.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Daylight vision begins when light activates cone photoreceptors in the retina, creating spatial patterns of neural activity. These cone signals are then combined and processed in downstream neural circuits, ultimately producing visual perception. Recent technical advances have made it possible to deliver visual stimuli to the retina that probe this processing by the visual system at its elementary resolution of individual cones. Physiological recordings from nonhuman primate retinas reveal the spatial organization of cone signals in retinal ganglion cells, including how signals from cones of different types are combined to support both spatial and color vision. Psychophysical experiments with human subjects characterize the visual sensations evoked by stimulating a single cone, including the perception of color. Future combined physiological and psychophysical experiments focusing on probing the elementary visual inputs are likely to clarify how neural processing generates our perception of the visual world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.