Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30857317›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2019

A Microfluidic Split-Flow Technology for Product Characterization in Continuous Low-Volume Nanoparticle Synthesis.

Holger Bolze, Peer Erfle, Juliane Riewe, Heike Bunjes, Andreas Dietzel, Thomas P Burg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Holger BolzeMax Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen 37077, Germany. holger.bolze@mpibpc.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-4172-7201
Peer ErfleCenter of Pharmaceutical Engineering, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig 38106, Germany. p.erfle@tu-bs.de.ORCID 0000-0003-4503-6392
Juliane RieweCenter of Pharmaceutical Engineering, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig 38106, Germany. j.riewe@tu-braunschweig.de.
Heike BunjesCenter of Pharmaceutical Engineering, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig 38106, Germany. heike.bunjes@tu-braunschweig.de.
Andreas DietzelCenter of Pharmaceutical Engineering, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig 38106, Germany. a.dietzel@tu-braunschweig.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2090-6259
Thomas P BurgMax Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen 37077, Germany. tburg@mpibpc.mpg.de.

Funding

Boehringer Ingelheim 0000Niedersächsisches Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kultur 0000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key aspect of microfluidic processes is their ability to perform chemical reactions in small volumes under continuous flow. However, a continuous process requires stable reagent flow over a prolonged period. This can be challenging in microfluidic systems, as bubbles or particles easily block or alter the flow. Online analysis of the product stream can alleviate this problem by providing a feedback signal. When this signal exceeds a pre-defined range, the process can be re-adjusted or interrupted to prevent contamination. Here we demonstrate the feasibility of this concept by implementing a microfluidic detector downstream of a segmented-flow system for the synthesis of lipid nanoparticles. To match the flow rate through the detector to the measurement bandwidth independent of the synthesis requirements, a small stream is sidelined from the original product stream and routed through a measuring channel with 2 × 2 µm cross-section. The small size of the measuring channel prevents the entry of air plugs, which are inherent to our segmented flow synthesis device. Nanoparticles passing through the small channel were detected and characterized by quantitative fluorescence measurements. With this setup, we were able to count single nanoparticles. This way, we were able to detect changes in the particle synthesis affecting the size, concentration, or velocity of the particles in suspension. We envision that the flow-splitting scheme demonstrated here can be transferred to detection methods other than fluorescence for continuous monitoring and feedback control of microfluidic nanoparticle synthesis.

Indexed as

fluorescencelipid nanoparticlesmicrofluidicsnanoparticle characterizationonline analysisplug flow mixerprecipitationsingle particle analysis

Identifiers

PMID30857317
PMCPMC6470898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.