Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30857294›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2019

Recurrent Emergency Department Users: Two Categories with Different Risk Profiles.

Ksenija Slankamenac, Meret Zehnder, Tim O Langner, Kathrin Krähenmann, Dagmar I Keller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Polypharmacy Thresholds that Best Predict Emergency Room Visits and Mortality in Older Adults: A Population-Based Study in Québec, Canada.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sensitivity Analysis: A Method to Promote Certainty and Transparency in Nursing and Health Research.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ksenija SlankamenacEmergency Department, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland. ksenija.slankamenac@usz.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-3568-9253
Meret ZehnderEmergency Department, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland. meret.zehnder@usz.ch.
Tim O LangnerEmergency Department, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland. tim.langner@usz.ch.
Kathrin KrähenmannEmergency Department, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland. kathrin.kraehenmann@usz.ch.
Dagmar I KellerEmergency Department, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland. dagmar.keller@usz.ch.

Funding

Promedica Stiftung GHDE KXQ7-DZZ (1385/M)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recurrent emergency department (ED) visits are responsible for an increasing proportion of overcrowding. Therefore, our aim was to investigate the characteristics and prevalence of recurrent ED visitors as well as to determine risk factors associated with multiple ED visits. ED patients visiting the ED of a tertiary care hospital at least four times consecutively in 2015 were enrolled. Of 33,335 primary ED visits, 1921 ED visits (5.8%) were performed by 372 ED patients who presented in the ED at least four times within the one-year period. Two different categories of recurrent ED patients were identified: repeated ED users presenting always with the same symptoms and frequent ED visitors who were suffering from different symptoms on each ED visit. Repeated ED users had more ED visits (

Indexed as

recurrent emergency department visitsrepeated and frequent emergency department visitors

Identifiers

PMID30857294
PMCPMC6463097
OpenAlexW2920808317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.