Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30857285›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Recent Advances in Electrosynthesized Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Sensing Platforms for Bioanalyte Detection.

Robert D Crapnell, Alexander Hudson, Christopher W Foster, Kasper Eersels, Bart van Grinsven, Thomas J Cleij, Craig E Banks, Marloes Peeters

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Robert D CrapnellFaculty of Science & Engineering, Div. of Chemistry & Environmental Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, John Dalton Building, Chester Street, Manchester M1 5GD, UK. r.crapnell@mmu.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8701-3933
Alexander HudsonFaculty of Science & Engineering, Div. of Chemistry & Environmental Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, John Dalton Building, Chester Street, Manchester M1 5GD, UK. a.hudson@mmu.ac.uk.
Christopher W FosterFaculty of Science & Engineering, Div. of Chemistry & Environmental Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, John Dalton Building, Chester Street, Manchester M1 5GD, UK. Chris.W.Foster@mmu.ac.uk.
Kasper EerselsSensor Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. kasper.eersels@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-0214-1320
Bart van GrinsvenSensor Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. bart.vangrinsven@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-6939-0866
Thomas J CleijSensor Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. thomas.cleij@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-0172-9330
Craig E BanksFaculty of Science & Engineering, Div. of Chemistry & Environmental Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, John Dalton Building, Chester Street, Manchester M1 5GD, UK. c.banks@mmu.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0756-9764
Marloes PeetersFaculty of Science & Engineering, Div. of Chemistry & Environmental Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, John Dalton Building, Chester Street, Manchester M1 5GD, UK. m.peeters@mmu.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0429-8073

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/R029296/1National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research CRACK!IT grant Marloes Peeters
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate detection of biological materials has remained at the forefront of scientific research for decades. This includes the detection of molecules, proteins, and bacteria. Biomimetic sensors look to replicate the sensitive and selective mechanisms that are found in biological systems and incorporate these properties into functional sensing platforms. Molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) are synthetic receptors that can form high affinity binding sites complementary to the specific analyte of interest. They utilise the shape, size, and functionality to produce sensitive and selective recognition of target analytes. One route of synthesizing MIPs is through electropolymerization, utilising predominantly constant potential methods or cyclic voltammetry. This methodology allows for the formation of a polymer directly onto the surface of a transducer. The thickness, morphology, and topography of the films can be manipulated specifically for each template. Recently, numerous reviews have been published in the production and sensing applications of MIPs; however, there are few reports on the use of electrosynthesized MIPs (eMIPs). The number of publications and citations utilising eMIPs is increasing each year, with a review produced on the topic in 2012. This review will primarily focus on advancements from 2012 in the use of eMIPs in sensing platforms for the detection of biologically relevant materials, including the development of increased polymer layer dimensions for whole bacteria detection and the use of mixed monomer compositions to increase selectivity toward analytes.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesMolecular ImprintingPolymersProteinsPolymersProteinsbacteriabiomoleculeselectropolymerizationelectrosynthesismolecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs)proteinssensors

Identifiers

PMID30857285
PMCPMC6427210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.