Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30856581›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in virology2019

The amazing HK97 fold: versatile results of modest differences.

Robert L Duda, Carolyn M Teschke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in virology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Hawaiian Geothermal Fumaroles Contain Diverse and Novel Viruses.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genome-based taxonomic classification ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. TheJournal of virology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Encapsulins: catalysis inside a shell.Current opinion in microbiology · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Robert L DudaDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States. Electronic address: duda@pitt.edu.
Carolyn M TeschkeDepartments of Molecular and Cell Biology, and Chemistry, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269-3125, United States. Electronic address: carolyn.teschke@uconn.edu.

Funding

ASSEMBLY AND STRUCTURE OF BACTERIOPHAGE LAMBDAR01GM047795 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DUDA, ROBERT LOUIS · 1991 to 2017
$7.8M
Understanding the Protein:Protein Interactions Required for Virus AssemblyR01GM076661 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI TESCHKE, CAROLYN M · 2007 to 2022
$7.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM047795NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076661
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

dsDNA Bacteriophages, some dsDNA archaeal viruses and the Herpesviruses share many features including a common capsid assembly pathway and coat protein fold. The coat proteins of these viruses, which have the HK97 fold, co-assemble with a free or attached scaffolding protein and other capsid proteins into a precursor capsid, known as a procapsid or prohead. The procapsid is a metastable state that increases in stability as a result of morphological changes that occur during the dsDNA packaging reaction. We review evidence from several systems indicating that proper contacts acquired in the assembly of the procapsid are critical to forming the correct morphology in the mature capsid.

Indexed as

Archaeal VirusesBacteriophagesCapsidCapsid ProteinsHerpesviridaeModels, MolecularProtein FoldingCapsid Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30856581
PMCPMC6626583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.