Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30856235›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Comparative metabolomic profiling in the roots and leaves in contrasting genotypes reveals complex mechanisms involved in post-anthesis drought tolerance in wheat.

Zhiyu Kang, Md Ali Babar, Naeem Khan, Jia Guo, Jahangir Khan, Shafiqul Islam, Sumit Shrestha, Dipendra Shahi

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Exogenous Application of Glycine Betaine toInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Responses of 'Flordaguard' and 'MP-29'Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Plant Metabolomics: Current Initiatives and Future Prospects.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Wheat Omics: Advancements and Opportunities.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhiyu KangCollege of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China.
Md Ali BabarAgronomy Dept., University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9951-6856
Naeem KhanPlant Science, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Jia GuoAgronomy Dept., University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Jahangir KhanAgronomy Dept., University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Shafiqul IslamAgronomy Dept., University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Sumit ShresthaAgronomy Dept., University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Dipendra ShahiAgronomy Dept., University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the contrasting biochemical changes in different plant parts in response to drought can help to formulate smart strategies to develop drought tolerant genotypes. The current study used metabolomics and physiological approaches to understand the differential biochemical changes coupled with physiological adjustments in leaves and roots to cope with drought stress in two wheat genotypes, LA754 (drought tolerant) and AGS2038 (drought sensitive). The gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis and physiological trait estimation were performed in the roots and leaves after drought imposition. Drought induced reduction was observed in all physiological and yield related traits. In LA754, higher numbers of metabolites were altered in leaves (45) compared to roots (20) which indicates that plants allocated more resources to leaves in tolerant genotype. In addition, the metabolic components of the root were less affected by the stress which supports the idea that the roots are more drought tolerant than the leaf or shoot. In AGS2038, thirty and twenty eight metabolites were altered in the leaves and roots, respectively. This indicates that the sensitive genotype compromised resource allocation to leaves, rather allocated more towards roots. Tryptophan, valine, citric acid, fumaric acid, and malic acid showed higher accumulation in leaf in LA754, but decreased in the root, while glyceric acid was highly accumulated in the root, but not in the leaf. The results demonstrated that the roots and shoots have a different metabolic composition, and shoot metabolome is more variable than the root metabolome. Though the present study demonstrated that the metabolic response of shoots to drought contrasts with that of roots, some growth metabolites (protein, sugar, etc) showed a mirror increase in both parts. Protein synthesis and energy cycle was active in both organs, and the organs were metabolically activated to enhance water uptake and maintain growth to mitigate the effect of drought.

Indexed as

MetabolomeAcclimatizationDroughtsMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMetabolomicsPlant LeavesPlant RootsStress, PhysiologicalTriticumWaterWater

Identifiers

PMID30856235
PMCPMC6411144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.