Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30856210›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Factors associated with false-positive mammography at first screen in an Asian population.

Peh Joo Ho, Chek Mei Bok, Hanis Mariyah Mohd Ishak, Li Yan Lim, Jenny Liu, Fuh Yong Wong, Kee Seng Chia, Min-Han Tan, Wen Yee Chay, Mikael Hartman and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Peh Joo HoGenome Institute of Singapore, Genome, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-3017-4023
Chek Mei BokGenome Institute of Singapore, Genome, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Hanis Mariyah Mohd IshakSchool of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Li Yan LimDepartment of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Jenny LiuSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Fuh Yong WongNational Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Kee Seng ChiaSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Min-Han TanNational Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Wen Yee ChayNational Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Mikael HartmanDepartment of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Jingmei LiGenome Institute of Singapore, Genome, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
National University of Singapore · SGGenome Institute of Singapore · SGNational Cancer Centre Singapore · SGInstitute of Bioengineering and Nanotechnology · SGKarolinska Institutet · SENanyang Technological University · SGNational University Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFalse-positive recall is an issue in national screening programmes. The aim of this study is to investigate the recall rate at first screen and to identify potential predictors of false-positive recall in a multi-ethnic Asian population-based breast cancer screening programme.

methodsWomen aged 50-64 years attending screening mammography for the first time (n = 25,318) were included in this study. The associations between potential predictors (sociodemographic, lifestyle and reproductive) and false-positive recall were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression models.

resultsThe recall rate was 7.6% (n = 1,923), of which with 93.8% were false-positive. Factors independently associated with higher false-positive recall included Indian ethnicity (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.52 [1.25 to 1.84]), premenopause (1.23 [1.04 to 1.44]), nulliparity (1.85 [1.57 to 2.17]), recent breast symptoms (1.72 [1.31 to 2.23]) and history of breast lump excision (1.87 [1.53 to 2.26]). Factors associated with lower risk of false-positive recall included older age at screen (0.84 [0.73 to 0.97]) and use of oral contraceptives (0.87 [0.78 to 0.97]). After further adjustment of percent mammographic density, associations with older age at screening (0.97 [0.84 to 1.11]) and menopausal status (1.12 [0.95 to 1.32]) were attenuated and no longer significant.

conclusionFor every breast cancer identified, 15 women without cancer were subjected to further testing. Efforts to educate Asian women on what it means to be recalled will be useful in reducing unnecessary stress and anxiety.

Indexed as

Asian PeopleBiopsyBreast DensityBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHumansLife StyleMammographyMass ScreeningMenopauseMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPatient Education as TopicPremenopause

Identifiers

PMID30856210
PMCPMC6411141
OpenAlexW2921087088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.