Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30856178›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2019

Active surveillance identified a neglected burden of macular cases of Post Kala-azar Dermal Leishmaniasis in West Bengal.

Ritika Sengupta, Surya Jyati Chaudhuri, Srija Moulik, Manab Kumar Ghosh, Bibhuti Saha, Nilay Kanti Das, Mitali Chatterjee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Safety and immunogenicity of ChAd63-KH vaccine in post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis patients in Sudan.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2021
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ritika SenguptaDepartment of Pharmacology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Surya Jyati ChaudhuriGovt. Medical College, Purulia, West Bengal, India.
Srija MoulikDepartment of Pharmacology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Manab Kumar GhoshDepartment of Tropical Medicine, School of Tropical Medicine, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Bibhuti SahaDepartment of Tropical Medicine, School of Tropical Medicine, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Nilay Kanti DasDepartment of Dermatology, Bankura Sammilani Medical College, Bankura, West Bengal, India.
Mitali ChatterjeeDepartment of Pharmacology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5123-6019
Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · INBankura Sammilani Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPost Kala-azar Dermal Leishmaniasis (PKDL) develops in patients apparently cured of Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL), and is the strongest contender for being the disease reservoir. Therefore, existence of a few cases is sufficient to trigger an epidemic of VL in a given community, emphasizing the need for its active detection and in turn ensuring success of the current elimination program. This study explored the impact of active surveillance on the demographic profile of PKDL patients in West Bengal. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsPatients with PKDL were recruited through passive (2003-date, n = 100) and active surveillance (2015-date, n = 202), the former from outpatient departments of dermatology in medical colleges in West Bengal and the latter through an active door-to-door survey in four VL hyper-endemic districts of West Bengal. Passive surveillance indicated a male preponderance and a predominance of polymorphic lesions, whereas active surveillance indicated absence of any gender bias and more importantly, macular PKDL constituted almost 50% of the population burden. In terms of polymorphic vs. macular PKDL, the former appeared at a later age, their disease duration was longer and had a higher parasite burden. In the polymorphic variant, the lesional distribution was asymmetrical, comprised of papules/nodules/macules that were present mainly in sun-exposed areas whereas in macular cases, the hypopigmented patches were diffusely present all over the body. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Active surveillance unraveled a disease component whose demographic profile showed important differences with PKDL cases who sought treatment in government hospitals. Detection of a higher proportion of macular cases indicates that this variant is not an uncommon presentation as conventionally stated in text books, and should be studied in greater detail to ensure success of the ongoing Leishmaniasis elimination programme.

Indexed as

Epidemiological MonitoringAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansIndiaLeishmaniasis, CutaneousLeishmaniasis, VisceralMaleRisk FactorsSex FactorsSkinYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30856178
PMCPMC6428339
OpenAlexW2922343272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.