Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30856174›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2019

A complete statistical model for calibration of RNA-seq counts using external spike-ins and maximum likelihood theory.

Rodoniki Athanasiadou, Benjamin Neymotin, Nathan Brandt, Wei Wang, Lionel Christiaen, David Gresham, Daniel Tranchina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Quantitative Analysis of Embryo Gene Expression by Real-Time PCR.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Practical RNA-Seq with Spike-Ins: A Bench-to-Bioinformatics Guide.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rodoniki AthanasiadouCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Benjamin NeymotinCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Nathan BrandtCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7774-7749
Wei WangCenter for Developmental Genetics, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0480-671X
Lionel ChristiaenCenter for Developmental Genetics, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
David GreshamCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Daniel TranchinaDepartment of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0439-8349

Funding

Regulation of muscle fate specification and cell migration in cardiogenic lineageR01HL108643 · NHLBI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI MOGILNER, ALEXANDER · 2011 to 2023
$5.4M
Regulation of Quiescence in Eukaryotic CellsR01GM107466 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI GRESHAM, DAVID · 2013 to 2022
$3.0M
Brachyury-downstream gene networks in the notochordR01GM100466 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI DI GREGORIO, ANNA · 2012 to 2015
$1.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL108643NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM100466NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fundamental assumption, common to the vast majority of high-throughput transcriptome analyses, is that the expression of most genes is unchanged among samples and that total cellular RNA remains constant. As the number of analyzed experimental systems increases however, different independent studies demonstrate that this assumption is often violated. We present a calibration method using RNA spike-ins that allows for the measurement of absolute cellular abundance of RNA molecules. We apply the method to pooled RNA from cell populations of known sizes. For each transcript, we compute a nominal abundance that can be converted to absolute by dividing by a scale factor determined in separate experiments: the yield coefficient of the transcript relative to that of a reference spike-in measured with the same protocol. The method is derived by maximum likelihood theory in the context of a complete statistical model for sequencing counts contributed by cellular RNA and spike-ins. The counts are based on a sample from a fixed number of cells to which a fixed population of spike-in molecules has been added. We illustrate and evaluate the method with applications to two global expression data sets, one from the model eukaryote Saccharomyces cerevisiae, proliferating at different growth rates, and differentiating cardiopharyngeal cell lineages in the chordate Ciona robusta. We tested the method in a technical replicate dilution study, and in a k-fold validation study.

Indexed as

Likelihood FunctionsModels, StatisticalAnimalsCalibrationCionaGene ExpressionGenes, FungalHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingRNA, FungalSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSequence Analysis, RNARNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID30856174
PMCPMC6428340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.