ReviewThe British journal of radiology2019
CT support of cardiac structural interventions.
Review in The British journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Right Ventricular Function in Patients With Significant Tricuspid Regurgitation.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Cardiac CT for electrophysiological interventions.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Review
- Characterizing Low-cost Registration for Photographic Images to Computed Tomography.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024Article
- The role of CT in arrhythmia management-treatment planning and post-procedural imaging surveillance.The British journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for preprocedural planning of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence in medical imaging: A radiomic guide to precision phenotyping of cardiovascular disease.Cardiovascular research · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.