Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30855978›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2019

Is the laparoscopic approach a safe choice for the management of acute appendicitis in pregnant women? A meta-analysis of observational studies.

M Frountzas, C Nikolaou, K Stergios, K Kontzoglou, K Toutouzas, V Pergialiotis

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Analysis of 190 Female Patients after Appendectomy.Obstetrics and gynecology international · 2021
    Article
  12. Acute Appendicitis in Pregnancy: How to Manage?Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M FrountzasLaboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens , Greece.
C NikolaouLaboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens , Greece.
K StergiosGeneral Surgery, Watford General Hospital , Watford , UK.
K KontzoglouLaboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens , Greece.
K Toutouzas1st Department of Propedeutic Surgery, Hippokration General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens , Athens , Greece.
V PergialiotisLaboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens , Greece.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRLaiko General Hospital of Athens · GRWatford General Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAcute appendicitis is a common and serious situation during pregnancy, because of the increased risk of fetal loss and perforation in the third trimester, as well as a diagnostic difficulty. During recent years laparoscopic approach has been introduced to clinical practice with encouraging results. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the surgical and obstetrical outcomes between laparoscopic and open appendectomy during pregnancy. MATERIALS AND

methodsMEDLINE, SCOPUS, Clinicaltrials.gov, CENTRAL and Google Scholar were searched for studies reporting on postoperative outcomes between laparoscopic and open appendectomy during pregnancy. The random effects model (DerSimonian-Laird) was used to calculate pooled effect estimates when high heterogeneity was encountered, otherwise the fixed-effects (Mantel-Haenszel) model was implemented.

resultsTwenty-one studies that enrolled 6276 pregnant women are included in the present meta-analysis. Of these women, 1963 underwent laparoscopic appendectomy and 4313 underwent an open appendectomy. Women who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy demonstrated an increase in fetal loss risk, while neonates of women that underwent open appendectomy presented decreased Apgar score at five minutes after birth. All the rest outcomes were similar between the two groups. The time that each study took place seemed to affect the comparison of birth weight and postoperative hospital stay between the two groups.

conclusionLaparoscopic appendectomy seems to be a relatively safe therapeutic option in pregnancy when it is indicated. Thus, it should be implemented in clinical practice, always considering the experience of the surgeon in such procedures. Nevertheless, the need of new studies to enhance this statement remains crucial.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyAcute DiseaseAppendicitisFemaleHumansObservational Studies as TopicPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsAppendicitisLaparoscopyPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID30855978
PMCPMC6432950
OpenAlexW2921836964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.