ArticleMedicine2019
Comparison of the accuracy of cannulated pedicle screw versus conventional pedicle screw in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A randomized retrospective study.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comprehensive review of biomechanical factors influencing pedicle screw fixation strength and the critical role of artificial intelligence.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Enhancing the Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement Using 3D-Printed Screw-Guiding Techniques in the Lumbosacral Region for Small Breed Dogs: A Cadaveric Study.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Comparison of the accuracy of the cannulated pedicle screw and the classical pedicle screw in the treatment of Scheuermann's kyphosis: A retrospective study.Joint diseases and related surgery · 2020Article
- Is it an asymptomatic tracheal injury or misdiagnosis in treatment of vertebral fracture: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPedicle screws are commonly used to treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Many studies have discussed the rates and effects of pedicle screw misplacement. In this study, to increase the accuracy rate, cannulated pedicle screws were inserted into the periapical vertebrae, highly rotated vertebrae, and vertebrae with very thin pedicles in a single patient group. We compared these results with those of a patient group who underwent conventional pedicle screw placement.
methodsTwenty-eight AIS patients treated surgically between 2015 and 2017 with cannulated pedicle screws or conventional pedicle screws were included. Group 1 (n = 15) received cannulated pedicle screws, whereas group 2 (n = 13) received conventional pedicle screws. Postoperative computed tomography scans were used to evaluate pedicle screw position. Pedicle perforation was assessed using the classification by Rao et al: grade 0, no perforation; grade 1, only the threads outside the pedicle (less than 2 mm); grade 2, core screw diameter outside the pedicle (2-4 mm); and grade 3, screw entirely outside the pedicle. Medial screw malposition was measured between the medial pedicle wall and the medial margin of the screw. Lateral screw malposition was measured between the lateral corpus wall and lateral screw margin.
resultsPlacement accuracy of 703 screws (group 1, 376; group 2, 327) was evaluated. A total of 142 (20.1%) pedicle screw perforations occurred: 63 (17.1%) in group 1 and 79 (25%) in group 2 (P < .05). There was no statistically significant intergroup difference in medial perforation (group 1, 34 [9%] vs group 2, 31 [10%]). Lateral perforation was significantly less common in group 1 (n = 29; 7.7%) than in group 2 (n = 4; 14.7%) (P = .0002).
conclusionsThe use of cannulated screws to treat AIS decreases perforation and complication rates. Although it did not significantly lower the medial perforation rate, it dramatically reduced the lateral perforation rate. The use of cannulated screws enables intraoperative confirmation of placement accuracy. Our data suggest that cannulated pedicle screw use to treat AIS is safer and more efficient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.