ArticleMedicine2019
Efficacy of erlotinib and celecoxib for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Common oncogenic mutations in colorectal cancer: drivers of carcinogenesis and potential therapeutic targets.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- COX 2-inhibitors; a thorough and updated survey into combinational therapies in cancers.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2024Review
- Association of COX-inhibitors with cancer patients' survival under chemotherapy and radiotherapy regimens: a real-world data retrospective cohort analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Celecoxib Blocks Vasculogenic MimicryFrontiers in oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of erlotinib and celecoxib (EC) for treating Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (ANSCLC) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild type.Totally, 75 subjects with ANSCLC and EGFR wild type were included. They all underwent EC treatment. The outcome measurements consisted of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), progress disease (PD), and disease control rate (DCR). Additionally, adverse events were also documented.Two-year CR, PR, SD, PD, and DCR were 4.0%, 6.7%, 42.6%, 46.7%, and 53.3% respectively. The median PFS was 3.4 months, the median OS was 10.0 months. Additionally, acceptable toxicities were recorded in this study.The results showed that EC may be efficacious for patients with ANSCLC and EGFR wild type only, and acceptable toxicity among the Chinese Han population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.