ArticleBJPsych bulletin2019
Personal resilience in psychiatrists: systematic review.
Article in BJPsych bulletin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Male and Female Physician Suicidality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA psychiatry · 2020Pooled it
- Psychiatrists Under Pressure: Exploring Occupational Risks and Protective Strategies.Iranian journal of psychiatry · 2026Article
- Combating Burnout Amongst Residents Through Fostering Resilience: A Systematic Review.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2026Article
- Article
- Psychiatry as a vocation: Moral injury, COVID-19, and the phenomenology of clinical practice.Clinical ethics · 2024Article
- Experiences and support needs of consultant psychiatrists following a patient-perpetrated homicide.BJPsych bulletin · 2024Article
- Role of stressful life events and personality traits on the prevalence of wish to die among French physicians.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Perceived impact of patients' suicide and serious suicidal attempts on their treating psychiatrists and trainees: a national cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- Consultant psychiatrists' experience of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health services.Irish journal of psychological medicine · 2022Article
- Burn-out and relationship with the learning environment among psychiatry residents: a longitudinal study.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Responding to a Tragedy: Evaluation of a Postvention Protocol Among Adult Psychiatry Residents.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2021Article
- Burnout in consultants in child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) in Ireland: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Observational
- Personal resilience for psychiatrists: systematic review.BJPsych bulletin · 2019Article
- A Self-Monitoring Mobile App to Mitigate Risk Factors for Suicide and Self-Harm in Junior (Resident) Doctors: A Review, Thematic Analysis and Concept Proposal.Healthcare technology lettersReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims and methodThe concept of personal resilience is relevant to physician well-being, recruitment and retention, and to delivering compassionate patient care. This systematic review aims to explore factors affecting personal resilience among psychiatrists, in particular, those that may impair well-being and those that facilitate resilience practice. A literature search was performed of the Ovid®, Embase®, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases, using keywords to identify empirical studies involving psychiatrists that examined resilience, stress and burnout from the past 15 years.
resultsThirty-three international English language studies were included, showing that a combination of workplace, personal and non-workplace factors negatively and positively influenced well-being and resilience.Clinical implicationsGiven that workplace factors were the most commonly cited, it would appear that any resilience package that predominantly targets interventions at the workplace level would be particularly fruitful. Future research, however, needs to address the absence of a universal measurement of well-being and its moderators so that any potential interventions are better evaluated.Declaration of interestNone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.