Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30854476›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2019

Quantifying

Emilie Giraud, Oihane Martin, Laith Yakob, Matthew Rogers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Single-cell atlas ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. PeerJ · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emilie GiraudDepartment of Immunology and Infection, Faculty of Infectious Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0028-1944
Oihane MartinDepartment of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Laith YakobDepartment of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8639-4511
Matthew RogersDepartment of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. matthew.rogers@lshtm.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H022406/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting how

Indexed as

Insect Bites and StingsLeishmaniaAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleLeishmaniasisLeishmaniasis, CutaneousMiceParasite LoadPsychodidae

Identifiers

PMID30854476
PMCPMC6395631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.