ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2019
A Web-Based Response-Assessment System for Development and Validation of Imaging Biomarkers in Oncology.
Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in osteosarcoma using T2-based MRI delta-radiomics: a retrospective study.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Validation of a Method to Measure the T2 Value from the Color Mapping by Hue Value.Current medical imaging · 2023Article
- Quantitative Imaging Enters the Clinical Arena: A Personal Viewpoint.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2020Article
- Open Health Imaging Foundation Viewer: An Extensible Open-Source Framework for Building Web-Based Imaging Applications to Support Cancer Research.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantitative imaging biomarkers are increasingly used in oncology clinical trials to assist the evaluation of tumor responses to novel therapies. To identify these biomarkers and ensure smooth clinical translation once they have been validated, it is critical to develop a reliable workflow-efficient imaging platform for integration in clinical settings. Here we will present a web-based volumetric response-assessment system that we developed based on an open-source image viewing platform (WEASIS) and a DICOM image archive (DCM4CHEE). Our web-based response-assessment system offers a DICOM imaging archiving function, standard imaging viewing and manipulation functions, efficient tumor segmentation and quantification algorithms, and a reliable database containing tumor segmentation and measurement results. The prototype system is currently used in our research lab to foster the development and validation of new quantitative imaging biomarkers, including the volumetric computed tomography technique, as a more accurate and early assessment method of solid tumor responses to targeted and immunotherapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.