Trial reportTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2019
Real-Time Quantitative Assessment of Accuracy and Precision of Blood Volume Derived from DCE-MRI in Individual Patients During a Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Phase 2 Study of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided High-Dose Response-Adaptive Radiation Therapy With Concurrent Temozolomide in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: Results From an Interim Analysis.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025Trial
- Randomized Phase II Study of Physiologic MRI-Directed Adaptive Radiation Boost in Poor Prognosis Head and Neck Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022Trial
- Early HPV ctDNA Kinetics and Imaging Biomarkers Predict Therapeutic Response in p16+ Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022Trial
- Early MRI Blood Volume Changes in Constrictor Muscles Correlate With Postradiation Dysphagia.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2021Trial
- Imaging features and correlation with short-term prognosis in laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Interpretable survival network for progression risk analysis of multimodality imaging biomarkers in poor-prognosis head and neck cancers.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Joint Optimization of k-t Sampling Pattern and Reconstruction of DCE MRI for Pharmacokinetic Parameter Estimation.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2022Article
- Quantitative Imaging Enters the Clinical Arena: A Personal Viewpoint.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2020Article
- Predictive Values of MRI and PET Derived Quantitative Parameters for Patterns of Failure in Both p16+ and p16- High Risk Head and Neck Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accuracy and precision of quantitative imaging (QI) metrics should be assessed in real time in each patient during a clinical trial to support QI-based decision-making. We developed a framework for real-time quantitative assessment of QI metrics and evaluated accuracy and precision of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived blood volume (BV) in a clinical trial for head and neck cancers. Patients underwent DCE-MRI before and after 2 weeks of radiation therapy (2wkRT). A mean as a reference value and a repeatability coefficient (RC) of BV values established from
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.