Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30854405›Full record

ArticleNeurophotonics2019

Investigating the feasibility of channelrhodopsin variants for nanoscale optogenetics.

Markus A Stahlberg, Charu Ramakrishnan, Katrin I Willig, Edward S Boyden, Karl Deisseroth, Camin Dean

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurophotonics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparing behaviours induced by natural memory retrieval and optogenetic reactivation of an engram ensemble in mice.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Formation and fate of an engram in the lateral amygdala supporting a rewarding memory in mice.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  7. Opto-extinction of a threat memory in mice.Brain research bulletin · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Dendritic Architecture PredictsFrontiers in neural circuits · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Enlightening the frontiers of neurogastroenterology through optogenetics.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Markus A StahlbergEuropean Neuroscience Institute, Trans-Synaptic Signaling Group, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1694-0489
Charu RamakrishnanStanford University, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Bioengineering, Department of Psychiatry, CNC Program, Stanford, California, United States.
Katrin I WilligUniversity Medical Center, Center for Nanoscale Microscopy and Molecular Physiology of the Brain, Goettingen, Germany.
Edward S BoydenMIT Media Lab and McGovern Institute, Departments of Brain and Cognitive Science and Biological Engineering, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States.
Karl DeisserothStanford University, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Bioengineering, Department of Psychiatry, CNC Program, Stanford, California, United States.
Camin DeanEuropean Neuroscience Institute, Trans-Synaptic Signaling Group, Goettingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optogenetics has revolutionized the study of circuit function in the brain, by allowing activation of specific ensembles of neurons by light. However, this technique has not yet been exploited extensively at the subcellular level. Here, we test the feasibility of a focal stimulation approach using stimulated emission depletion/reversible saturable optical fluorescence transitions-like illumination, whereby switchable light-gated channels are focally activated by a laser beam of one wavelength and deactivated by an overlapping donut-shaped beam of a different wavelength, confining activation to a center focal region. This method requires that activated channelrhodopsins are inactivated by overlapping illumination of a distinct wavelength and that photocurrents are large enough to be detected at the nanoscale. In tests of current optogenetic tools, we found that ChR2 C128A/H134R/T159C and CoChR C108S and C108S/D136A-activated with 405-nm light and inactivated by coillumination with 594-nm light-and C1V1 E122T/C167S-activated by 561-nm light and inactivated by 405-nm light-were most promising in terms of highest photocurrents and efficient inactivation with coillumination. Although further engineering of step-function channelrhodopsin variants with higher photoconductances will be required to employ this approach at the nanoscale, our findings provide a framework to guide future development of this technique.

Indexed as

channelrhodopsinoptogeneticsRESOLFT microscopySTED microscopy

Identifiers

PMID30854405
PMCPMC6393647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.