Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30854314›Full record

ArticleAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery2019

Adult cardiac veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (VA-ECMO): prevention and management of acute complications.

Michael M Koerner, Michael D Harper, Christopher K Gordon, Douglas Horstmanshof, James W Long, Michael J Sasevich, James D Neel, Aly El Banayosy

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael M KoernerAdvanced Cardiac Care and Transplant Institute, Integris Baptist Medical Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Michael D HarperAdvanced Cardiac Care and Transplant Institute, Integris Baptist Medical Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Christopher K GordonAdvanced Cardiac Care and Transplant Institute, Integris Baptist Medical Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Douglas HorstmanshofAdvanced Cardiac Care and Transplant Institute, Integris Baptist Medical Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
James W LongAdvanced Cardiac Care and Transplant Institute, Integris Baptist Medical Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Michael J SasevichAdvanced Cardiac Care and Transplant Institute, Integris Baptist Medical Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
James D NeelAdvanced Cardiac Care and Transplant Institute, Integris Baptist Medical Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Aly El BanayosyAdvanced Cardiac Care and Transplant Institute, Integris Baptist Medical Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
INTEGRIS Baptist Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVeno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has been shown to be a viable and effective treatment for patients suffering from refractory cardiogenic shock (rCS), which is associated with high mortality rates. Although ECMO therapy used as short-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has shown tremendous growth in its application over the past decade, the complication and mortality rates remain high. This retrospective study analyzes complications associated with VA-ECMO support, evaluates the use of defined protocols at a single center, and examines factors that may contribute to patient complication and mortality.

methodsThis retrospective analysis included 184 patients who were supported with ECMO from September 2014 through March 2018 at Integris Baptist Medical Center (IBMC). Descriptive statistics were generated to analyze baseline characteristics, demographics, complications, and outcomes.

resultsAcute myocardial infarct (AMI) was the primary etiology of this cohort (N=40; 22%). The mean age was 55±15 (median 56, range 15-84) years. All patients were inotrope and/or vasopressor dependent prior to ECMO initiation. Mean time on ECMO support was 7.8±7.9 days with median time of 6 days. Total patient days on support were 1,430. Most ECMO cannulations, 97 (52%) were performed within Integris Baptist Medical Center, with 48% done outside the hospital; 38% were performed outside of the hospital by the IBMC ECMO team, and 10.5% were performed by an outside team. Bleeding was noted to be the most common VA ECMO complication [N=41; 22.3%; 0.028 events per patient day (EPPD)].

conclusionsA dedicated 24/7 ECMO service using a multidisciplinary team (MDT) and defined protocols in a single center is able to effectively reduce complications due to VA-ECMO support in the sickest of the sick VA-ECMO patients.

Indexed as

cardiogenic shockECMO complicationsVeno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO)

Identifiers

PMID30854314
PMCPMC6379202
OpenAlexW2911449220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.