ArticleOncology letters2019
Clinical efficacy and safety evaluation of pemetrexed combined with radiotherapy in treatment of patients with lung adenocarcinoma brain metastasis.
Article in Oncology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- E3 ligase LMO7 enhances temozolomide sensitivity by promoting MGMT degradation in lung cancer.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026Article
- miR-17-5p/Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of pemetrexed combined with stereotactic gamma-ray radiotherapy in the treatment of patients with lung adenocarcinoma brain metastasis in The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province were evaluated. A total of 67 patients with lung adenocarcinoma brain metastasis in experimental group were treated with simple pemetrexed chemotherapy, and then with radiotherapy, followed by pemetrexed chemotherapy. Their treatment results were compared with those of 53 patients treated with simple gamma knife in control group. The results were analyzed by comparing the clinical efficacy, side reactions, serum level changes, and survival between the two groups. Among 67 patients in the experimental group, there were 16 cases of complete response (CR), 39 cases of partial response (PR), 7 cases of stable disease (SD) and 5 cases of progressive disease (PD), with an effective rate of 82.09% (55/67) and a tumor local control rate of 92.54% (62/67). Among 53 patients in the control group, there were 13 cases of CR, 20 cases of PR, 9 cases of SD and 11 cases of PD, with an effective rate of 62.26% (33/53) and a tumor local control rate of 79.25% (42/53). There were statistically significant differences in the effective rate and local control rate between the two groups (P<0.05). The 6-, 12- and 24-month survival rates in experimental group were higher than those in control group (P<0.05). The main adverse reactions after pemetrexed combined with radiotherapy were lower than those after simple radiotherapy (P<0.05). The expression levels of the tumor markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin fragment antigen 21-1 (CYFRA21-1) in the two groups of patients after treatment were lower than those before treatment (P<0.05). After treatment, the expression levels of serum CEA and CYFRA21-1 in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). Pemetrexed combined with radiotherapy in the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma brain metastasis is more effective than simple radiotherapy, with lighter adverse reactions, worthy of clinical application and promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.