ArticleNature physics2019
Wavelength-scale errors in optical localization due to spin-orbit coupling of light.
Article in Nature physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optical Spin Angular Momentum: Properties, Topologies, Detection and Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Nearfield observation of spin-orbit interactions at nanoscale using photoinduced force microscopy.Science advances · 2024Article
- Tracking the extensive three-dimensional motion of single ions by an engineered point-spread function.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Electrodynamic Interference and Induced Polarization in Nanoparticle-Based Optical Matter Arrays.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2024Article
- Spiraling light: from donut modes to a Magnus effect analogy.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2022Review
- Atomic scale displacements detected by optical image cross-correlation analysis and 3D printed marker arrays.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Ultrahigh-Speed Imaging of Rotational Diffusion on a Lipid Bilayer.Nano letters · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Far-field optical imaging techniques allow the determination of the position of point-like emitters and scatterers [1-3]. Although the optical wavelength sets a fundamental limit to the image resolution of unknown objects, the position of an individual emitter can in principle be estimated from the image with arbitrary precision. This is used for example in the determination of stars position [4] or in optical super-resolution microscopy [5]. Furthermore, precise position determination is an experimental prerequisite for the manipulation and measurement of individual quantum systems, such as atoms, ions, and solid-state-based quantum emitters [6-8]. Here we demonstrate that spin-orbit coupling of light in the emission of elliptically polarized emitters can lead to systematic, wavelength-scale errors in the estimation of the emitters position. Imaging a single trapped atom as well as a single sub-wavelength-diameter gold nanoparticle, we demonstrate a shift between the emitters measured and actual positions which is comparable to the optical wavelength. For certain settings, the expected shift can become arbitrarily large. Beyond optical imaging techniques, our findings could be relevant for the localization of objects using any type of wave that carries orbital angular momentum relative to the emitters position with a component orthogonal to the direction of observation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.