ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2019
Classification of Movement Intention Using Independent Components of Premovement EEG.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Novel Multi-Modal Flexible Headband System for Sleep Monitoring.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Home Robot Interaction Based on EEG Motor Imagery and Visual Perception Fusion.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Ensemble Learning-Based Alzheimer's Disease Classification Using Electroencephalogram Signals and Clock Drawing Test Images.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Research on Adaptive Discriminating Method of Brain-Computer Interface for Motor Imagination.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Post-Movement Beta Synchrony Inhibits Cortical Excitability.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Multisensor Integrated Platform Based on MEMS Charge Variation Sensing Technology for Biopotential Acquisition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Fixation-related visual mismatch negativity.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- Long-Term Polygraphic Monitoring through MEMS and Charge Transfer for Low-Power Wearable Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Metric Learning in Freewill EEG Pre-Movement and Movement Intention Classification for Brain Machine Interfaces.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Brain Activity Reflects Subjective Response to Delayed Input When Using an Electromyography-Controlled Robot.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021Article
- An Investigation of Insider Threat Mitigation Based on EEG Signal Classification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Analysis of Human Gait Using Hybrid EEG-fNIRS-Based BCI System: A Review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Review
- Investigation of Delayed Response during Real-Time Cursor Control Using Electroencephalography.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2020Article
- Characteristics of Kinematic Parameters in Decoding Intended Reaching Movements Using Electroencephalography (EEG).Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many previous studies on brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) have focused on electroencephalography (EEG) signals elicited during motor-command execution to generate device commands. However, exploiting pre-execution brain activity related to movement intention could improve the practical applicability of BMIs. Therefore, in this study we investigated whether EEG signals occurring before movement execution could be used to classify movement intention. Six subjects performed reaching tasks that required them to move a cursor to one of four targets distributed horizontally and vertically from the center. Using independent components of EEG acquired during a premovement phase, two-class classifications were performed for left vs. right trials and top vs. bottom trials using a support vector machine. Instructions were presented visually (test) and aurally (condition). In the test condition, accuracy for a single window was about 75%, and it increased to 85% in classification using two windows. In the control condition, accuracy for a single window was about 73%, and it increased to 80% in classification using two windows. Classification results showed that a combination of two windows from different time intervals during the premovement phase improved classification performance in the both conditions compared to a single window classification. By categorizing the independent components according to spatial pattern, we found that information depending on the modality can improve classification performance. We confirmed that EEG signals occurring during movement preparation can be used to control a BMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.