Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30853573›Full record

ArticleAcademic pediatrics

Impact of Mobile Device-Based Clinical Decision Support Tool on Guideline Adherence and Mental Workload.

Katherine M Richardson, Sarah D Fouquet, Ellen Kerns, Russell J McCulloh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic pediatrics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Implementing a COVID-19 Discharge Pathway to Improve Patient Safety.American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katherine M RichardsonDepartments of Pediatrics (KM Richardson, E Kerns, and RJ McCulloh). Electronic address: kmrichardson@cmh.edu.
Sarah D FouquetMedical Informatics and Telemedicine (SD Fouquet), Children's Mercy Kansas City, Mo.
Ellen KernsDepartments of Pediatrics (KM Richardson, E Kerns, and RJ McCulloh).
Russell J McCullohDepartments of Pediatrics (KM Richardson, E Kerns, and RJ McCulloh).

Funding

The Nebraska Pediatric Clinic Trials UnitUG1OD024953 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI Bradford A Brabec, Ellen Kerns · 2016 to 2026
$4.4M
SPeCTRE: The Sunflower Pediatric Clinical Trials Research ExtensionUG1HD090849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI MCCULLOH, RUSSELL JAMES · 2016 to 2016
$24k
NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD090849NIH HHS UG1 OD024953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the individual-level impact of an electronic clinical decision support (ECDS) tool, PedsGuide, on febrile infant clinical decision making and cognitive load.

methodsA counterbalanced, prospective, crossover simulation study was performed among attending and trainee physicians. Participants performed simulated febrile infant cases with use of PedsGuide and with standard reference text. Cognitive load was assessed using the NASA-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX), which determines mental, physical, temporal demand, effort, frustration, and performance. Usability was assessed with the System Usability Scale (SUS). Scores on cases and NASA-TLX scores were compared between condition states.

resultsA total of 32 participants completed the study. Scores on febrile infant cases using PedsGuide were greater compared with standard reference text (89% vs 72%, P = .001). NASA-TLX scores were lower (ie, more optimal) with use of PedsGuide versus control (mental 6.34 vs 11.8, P < .001; physical 2.6 vs 6.1, P = .001; temporal demand 4.6 vs 8.0, P = .003; performance 4.5 vs 8.3, P < .001; effort 5.8 vs 10.7, P < .001; frustration 3.9 vs 10, P < .001). The SUS had an overall score of 88 of 100 with rating of acceptable on the acceptability scale.

conclusionsUse of PedsGuide led to increased adherence to guidelines and decreased cognitive load in febrile infant management when compared with the use of a standard reference tool. This study employs a rarely used method of assessing ECDS tools using a multifaceted approach (medical decision-making, assessing usability, and cognitive workload,) that may be used to assess other ECDS tools in the future.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneDecision Support Systems, ClinicalGuideline AdherenceAdultCognitionFemaleFeverHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMental FatigueMiddle AgedPatient SimulationWorkloadYoung Adultelectronic clinical decision supportfebrile infantmental workloadpediatricsusability

Identifiers

PMID30853573
PMCPMC6732014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.