ArticleJournal of vascular surgery2019
Anatomic eligibility for transcarotid artery revascularization and transfemoral carotid artery stenting.
Article in Journal of vascular surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization: A systematic review.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2024Pooled it
- CREST-2 findings are unchanged using an aggregated control group for the CAS and CEA trial.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2026Article
- Endovascular treatment strategies in highly-calcified carotid stenoses.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2026Article
- Prospective, Multicenter Evaluation of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization in Standard-Risk Patients: 30-Day Outcomes of the ROADSTER 3 Study.Annals of neurology · 2026Article
- Proximal Protection Devices for Carotid Artery Stent Placement: A Benchtop Assessment of Flow Reversal Performance.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Age-Related Anatomical Changes in Carotid Artery Stenosis and Its Impact on Postoperative Complications in Stenting and Endarterectomy.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
- An International, Expert-Based Delphi Consensus Document on Controversial Issues about TransCarotid Artery Revascularization (TCAR).Annals of vascular surgery · 2025Article
- Seven years of the transcarotid artery revascularization surveillance project, comparison to transfemoral stenting and endarterectomy.Journal of vascular surgery · 2024Article
- Transcarotid arterial revascularization is feasible and safe with concomitant inferior vena cava occlusion.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2024Article
- "TCAR or nothing": the only options for some complex carotid stenosis.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2024Article
- Teaching vascular anatomy: the anatomy we know, the anatomy we see or the anatomy we need?Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2023Review
- Use of a prosthetic conduit for stent delivery in transcarotid artery revascularization for patients with unfavorable anatomy.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2023Article
- Use of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization, Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting, and Carotid Endarterectomy in the US From 2015 to 2019.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Analysis of the anatomic eligibility for transcarotid artery revascularization in Chinese patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy and transfemoral carotid artery stenting.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Effects of timing on in-hospital and one-year outcomes after transcarotid artery revascularization.Journal of vascular surgery · 2021Article
- Article
- Hybrid Carotid Revascularization with Transient Flow Reversal.Annals of Indian Academy of NeurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTranscarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has emerged as an alternative to transfemoral carotid artery stenting (tfCAS). We investigated the proportion of carotid arteries undergoing revascularization procedures that would be eligible for TCAR based on anatomic criteria and how many arteries at high anatomic risk for tfCAS would be amenable to TCAR.
methodsWe performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy or carotid stenting between 2012 and 2015. Patients were excluded if computed tomography angiography of the neck was not performed within 6 months of the procedure. We assessed TCAR eligibility on the basis of the instructions for use of the ENROUTE Transcarotid Neuroprotection System (Silk Road Medical, Sunnyvale, Calif) and high anatomic risk for tfCAS on the basis of anatomic factors known to make carotid cannulation more difficult or hazardous.
resultsOf the 118 patients and 236 carotid arteries identified, 12 carotid arteries were excluded for presence of an occluded internal carotid artery (ICA). Of the remaining 224 carotid arteries, 72% were eligible for TCAR on the basis of the instructions for use criteria; 100% had 4- to 9-mm ICA diameters, 100% had ≥6-mm common carotid artery (CCA) diameter, 75% had ≥5-cm clavicle to carotid bifurcation distance, and 96% lacked significant CCA puncture site plaque. In addition, 7% of carotid arteries had bifurcation anatomy unfavorable for stenting; thus, of the entire cohort of arteries examined, 68% were eligible for TCAR. Hyperlipidemia (odds ratio [OR], 6.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-26; P < .01), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.5-8.3; P < .01), and older age (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1; P < .01) were independently associated with TCAR ineligibility, whereas white race (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.0-1.0; P = .048) and beta-blocker use (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.7; P < .01) were independently associated with TCAR eligibility. In addition, 24% of carotid arteries were considered to be at high risk for tfCAS for the presence of a type III aortic arch (7.6%), severe aortic calcification (3.3%), tandem CCA lesions (7.1%), moderate to severe stenosis at the carotid ostium (8.9%), and tortuous distal ICA precluding embolic filter placement (4.5%). Active smoking (OR, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.9-10; P < .01), hyperlipidemia (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.2-14; P = .03), and older age (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1; P = .02) were independently associated with tfCAS ineligibility, whereas preoperative aspirin (OR, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.0-0.4; P < .001) or clopidogrel (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.8; P = .01) use was associated with tfCAS eligibility. Of the arteries that were considered to be at high risk for tfCAS, 69% were eligible for TCAR.
conclusionsThe majority of carotid arteries in individuals selected for revascularization meet TCAR eligibility, making TCAR a viable treatment option for many patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.