Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30852704›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2019

Validation of contrast enhanced cine steady-state free precession and T2-weighted CMR for assessment of ischemic myocardial area-at-risk in the presence of reperfusion injury.

Esben Søvsø Szocska Hansen, Steen Fjord Pedersen, Steen Bønløkke Pedersen, Hans Erik Bøtker, Won Yong Kim

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Cardiovascular imaging 2019 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2020
    Article
  9. The severity of post-infarction edema suggests a bimodal pattern, whereas the extent does not.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Esben Søvsø Szocska HansenThe MR Research Centre and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Steen Fjord PedersenDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery T, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Steen Bønløkke PedersenDepartment of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital THG, Tage-Hansens Gade 2, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Hans Erik BøtkerDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Won Yong KimThe MR Research Centre and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark. yong.kim@clin.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1302-1671
Aarhus University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to validate by histopathology, contrast enhanced cine steady-state free precession and T2-weighted CMR for the assessment of ischemic myocardial area-at-risk (AAR) in the presence of microvascular obstruction (MVO). Eleven anesthetized pigs underwent CMR 7 to 10 days post infarction. The area-at-risk was measured from T2-weighted fast spin echo (T2-STIR) and contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession magnetic resonance imaging (CE-SSFP) images using semi-automated algorithms based on a priori knowledge of perfusion territory. Also, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was performed to measure final infarct size (FIS). Histopathological comparison with Evans blue dye to define AAR and triphenyltetrazolium chloride to define FIS served as the reference. All infarcts demonstrated MVO on LGE images. Bland-Altman analysis showed no significant bias in AAR or myocardial salvage between T2-STIR and CE-SSFP or between CMR and histopathology. The mean differences ± 2SD from Bland-Altman analysis were: AAR: Evans Blue vs. T2-STIR [0.7%; + 13.5%; - 12.1%]; AAR: Evans Blue vs. CE-SSFP [0.1%; + 13.8%; - 13.7%]; AAR: T2-STIR vs. CE-SSFP [0.7%; + 6.2%; - 4.9%]; Salvage: Evans Blue - TTC vs. T2-STIR-LGE [0.8%; + 11.1%; - 9.6%]; Salvage: Evans Blue - TTC vs. CE-SSFP-LGE [0.1%; + 9.9%; - 9.6%]; Salvage: CE-SSFP-LGE vs. T2-STIR-LGE [0.7%; + 6.2%; - 4.9%]. Both T2-STIR and CE-SSFP sequences allow for unbiased quantification of AAR in the presence of ischemia/reperfusion injury when analysed by semi-automated algorithms. These experimental data, which was validated by histopathology, supports the use of CMR for the assessment of myocardial salvage during the subacute phase.

Indexed as

AnimalsContrast MediaDisease Models, AnimalFemaleImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial Reperfusion InjuryMyocardiumObserver VariationOrganometallic CompoundsPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsSus scrofaTissue SurvivalContrast MediagadobutrolOrganometallic CompoundsEdemaFinal infarct sizeMagnetic resonance imagingMyocardium at riskSalvage

Identifiers

PMID30852704
OpenAlexW2921216023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.