ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2019
Validation of contrast enhanced cine steady-state free precession and T2-weighted CMR for assessment of ischemic myocardial area-at-risk in the presence of reperfusion injury.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Pharmaceutical Manipulation of Mitochondrial F0F1-ATP Synthase Enables Imaging and Protection of Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury Through Stress-induced Selective Enrichment.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Left Ventricular Adverse Remodeling in Ischemic Heart Disease: Emerging Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Biomarkers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Clinical presentation and cardiac imaging findings in patient cases of perimyocarditis and pericarditis with a temporal association to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Myocardial area at risk and salvage in reperfused acute MI measured by texture analysis of cardiac T2 mapping and its prediction value of functional recovery in the convalescent stage.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2021Article
- CMR for myocardial characterization in ischemic heart disease: state-of-the-art and future developments.European radiology experimental · 2021Review
- Veno-occlusive unloading of the heart reduces infarct size in experimental ischemia-reperfusion.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Cardiovascular imaging 2019 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2020Article
- The severity of post-infarction edema suggests a bimodal pattern, whereas the extent does not.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic ResonanceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to validate by histopathology, contrast enhanced cine steady-state free precession and T2-weighted CMR for the assessment of ischemic myocardial area-at-risk (AAR) in the presence of microvascular obstruction (MVO). Eleven anesthetized pigs underwent CMR 7 to 10 days post infarction. The area-at-risk was measured from T2-weighted fast spin echo (T2-STIR) and contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession magnetic resonance imaging (CE-SSFP) images using semi-automated algorithms based on a priori knowledge of perfusion territory. Also, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was performed to measure final infarct size (FIS). Histopathological comparison with Evans blue dye to define AAR and triphenyltetrazolium chloride to define FIS served as the reference. All infarcts demonstrated MVO on LGE images. Bland-Altman analysis showed no significant bias in AAR or myocardial salvage between T2-STIR and CE-SSFP or between CMR and histopathology. The mean differences ± 2SD from Bland-Altman analysis were: AAR: Evans Blue vs. T2-STIR [0.7%; + 13.5%; - 12.1%]; AAR: Evans Blue vs. CE-SSFP [0.1%; + 13.8%; - 13.7%]; AAR: T2-STIR vs. CE-SSFP [0.7%; + 6.2%; - 4.9%]; Salvage: Evans Blue - TTC vs. T2-STIR-LGE [0.8%; + 11.1%; - 9.6%]; Salvage: Evans Blue - TTC vs. CE-SSFP-LGE [0.1%; + 9.9%; - 9.6%]; Salvage: CE-SSFP-LGE vs. T2-STIR-LGE [0.7%; + 6.2%; - 4.9%]. Both T2-STIR and CE-SSFP sequences allow for unbiased quantification of AAR in the presence of ischemia/reperfusion injury when analysed by semi-automated algorithms. These experimental data, which was validated by histopathology, supports the use of CMR for the assessment of myocardial salvage during the subacute phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.