Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30852651›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2019

Lower extremity endovenous reconstruction for symptomatic occlusive disease in pediatric patients: techniques, clinical outcomes, and long-term stent patencies.

Joseph L McDevitt, Ravi N Srinivasa, Anthony N Hage, Jacob J Bundy, Joseph J Gemmete, Jeffrey Forris Beecham Chick

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. [Antithrombotic therapy after iliac vein stenting].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph L McDevittDepartment of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Ravi N SrinivasaDepartment of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Anthony N HageDepartment of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jacob J BundyDepartment of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Joseph J GemmeteDepartment of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jeffrey Forris Beecham ChickCardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Inova Alexandria Hospital, 4320 Seminary Road, Alexandria, VA, USA. jeffreychick@gmail.com.
Michigan Medicine · USInova Alexandria Hospital · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USThomas Jefferson University Hospital · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndovascular stent reconstruction is the standard of care for chronic venous occlusive disease in adults, but it has not been reported in pediatric patients.

objectiveThis study reports the technical success, complications, clinical outcomes, and stent patency of iliocaval stent reconstruction for chronic iliocaval thrombosis in pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsFourteen patients, 13 (93%) male with a mean age of 16.4 years (range: 8-20 years), underwent iliocaval stent reconstruction for chronic iliocaval thrombosis. The mean number of prothrombotic risk factors was 2.5 (range: 0-4), including 7 (50%) patients with inferior vena cava atresia. At initial presentation, the Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology classification (CEAP) score was C3 in 2 (14%) patients, C4 in 11 (79%) patients, and C6 in 1 (7.1%) patient. Time course of presenting symptoms included chronic (>4 weeks) (n=7; 50%) and acute worsening of chronic symptoms (2-4 weeks) (n=7; 50%). Aspects of recanalization and reconstruction, stenting technical success, complications, clinical outcomes and stent patency were recorded. Clinical success was defined as a 1-point decrease in the CEAP. Primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency were defined by Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe guidelines.

resultsMost procedures employed three access sites (range: 2-4). Intravascular ultrasound was employed in 11 (79%) procedures. Blunt and sharp recanalization techniques were used in 12 (86%) and 2 (14%) patients, respectively. Stenting technical success was 100%. Two (14%) minor adverse events occurred and mean post-procedure hospitalization was 2.8 days (range: 1-8 days). Clinical success rates at 2 weeks, 6 months and 12 months were 85%, 82%, and 83%, respectively. At a mean final clinical follow-up of 88 months (range: 16-231 months), clinical success was 93%. Estimated 6- and 12-month primary stent patencies were 86% and 64%, respectively. Six- and 12-month primary-assisted and secondary stent patency rates were both 100%.

conclusionIliocaval stent reconstruction is an effective treatment for symptomatic chronic iliocaval thrombosis in pediatric patients with high rates of technical success, 6- and 12-month clinical success, and 6- and 12-month primary-assisted and secondary patency rates.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresStentsAdolescentAngiography, Digital SubtractionChildComputed Tomography AngiographyFemaleHumansLower ExtremityMalePhlebographyVascular PatencyVenous ThrombosisYoung AdultChildrenDeep venous thrombosisEndovenous reconstructionInferior vena cavaInterventional radiologyLower extremityStent

Identifiers

PMID30852651
OpenAlexW2922089954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.