ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2019
Parents' experience with positive newborn screening results for cystic fibrosis.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening: A Systematic Review-Driven Consensus Guideline from the United States Cystic Fibrosis Foundation.International journal of neonatal screening · 2025Guideline
- Parental experience and information needs following a positive newborn screening test-based neonatal diagnosis of a chronic condition: an integrative review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
- A 25-Year Retrospective on Bavaria's Newborn Screening Programme: Achievements, Challenges and Long-Term Follow-Up.International journal of neonatal screening · 2025Article
- Prevalence and predictors of parental distress at the communication of positivity at newborn screening for metabolic diseases: an Italian longitudinal study.BMJ paediatrics open · 2024Article
- Psychosocial Impact of False-Positive Newborn Screening Results: A Scoping Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Single-centre prospective evaluation of the first 5 years of cystic fibrosis newborn screening in Germany.ERJ open research · 2024Article
- [Newborn blood spot screening (NBS) in Germany : Status quo and presentation of a concept for further development].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2023Review
- Communicating a Positive Result at Newborn Screening and Parental Distress.International journal of neonatal screening · 2023Article
- Is Our Newborn Screening Working Well? A Literature Review of Quality Requirements for Newborn Blood Spot Screening (NBS) Infrastructure and Procedures.International journal of neonatal screening · 2023Review
- Being affiliated to a cystic fibrosis centre is important for parents' everyday life.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2022Article
- Psychosocial Issues Related to Newborn Screening: A Systematic Review and Synthesis.International journal of neonatal screening · 2022Review
- Communication of an Abnormal Metabolic New-Born Screening Result in The Netherlands: The Parental Perspective.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Co-designing Improved Communication of Newborn Bloodspot Screening Results to Parents: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2022Article
- Process evaluation of co-designed interventions to improve communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results.BMJ open · 2021Article
- "EClinicalMedicine · 2021Article
- Psychological Impact of NBS for CF.International journal of neonatal screening · 2020Review
- The Role of ExtendedInternational journal of neonatal screening · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Germany, screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) is part of the newborn screening since September 2016. The risk of psychological harm due to false-positive screening results is a longstanding concern. We investigated the parents' perception of the CF screening process in Bavaria and the communication after positive screening results with a questionnaire. Until August 2018, 192 children went through a final diagnostic testing after a positive CF screening result, and 105 (54.7%) families completed the questionnaire. Of these, only 30 parents obtained information about the newborn screening by a physician, despite this being mandatory in Germany. Parents being informed by a CF specialist (28.6%) about the positive screening result were more satisfied with the given information (80.0 versus 50% informed by the maternity ward), and the delay until the final diagnostic testing was shorter. More than 3 days between the information about the screening result and the diagnostic testing was too long for 77.7% of the families.Conclusion: Performing final diagnostic testing with only short delays and receiving satisfactory information is important. Therefore, parents should be informed directly by a CF center about positive screening results and only when sweat testing is possible within the next days. What is Known: • The risk of psychological harm due to false-positive screening results is a longstanding concern. • Satisfactory information about the positive CF screening result seem to reduce the parental stress. What is New: • Parents being informed directly by a CF specialist were more satisfied with the given information and the delay until the final diagnostic testing was shorter. • Our data support the concept that parents should better be informed directly by a CF specialist about positive screening results and only when sweat testing is possible within the next days to reduce parental stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30852643What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.