Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30852643›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2019

Parents' experience with positive newborn screening results for cystic fibrosis.

Inken Brockow, Uta Nennstiel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Communicating a Positive Result at Newborn Screening and Parental Distress.International journal of neonatal screening · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. "EClinicalMedicine · 2021
    Article
  16. Psychological Impact of NBS for CF.International journal of neonatal screening · 2020
    Review
  17. The Role of ExtendedInternational journal of neonatal screening · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Inken BrockowScreening Center, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority (LGL), Veterinaerstrasse 2, 85764, Oberschleissheim, Germany. Inken.brockow@lgl.bayern.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9872-4044
Uta NennstielScreening Center, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority (LGL), Veterinaerstrasse 2, 85764, Oberschleissheim, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Germany, screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) is part of the newborn screening since September 2016. The risk of psychological harm due to false-positive screening results is a longstanding concern. We investigated the parents' perception of the CF screening process in Bavaria and the communication after positive screening results with a questionnaire. Until August 2018, 192 children went through a final diagnostic testing after a positive CF screening result, and 105 (54.7%) families completed the questionnaire. Of these, only 30 parents obtained information about the newborn screening by a physician, despite this being mandatory in Germany. Parents being informed by a CF specialist (28.6%) about the positive screening result were more satisfied with the given information (80.0 versus 50% informed by the maternity ward), and the delay until the final diagnostic testing was shorter. More than 3 days between the information about the screening result and the diagnostic testing was too long for 77.7% of the families.Conclusion: Performing final diagnostic testing with only short delays and receiving satisfactory information is important. Therefore, parents should be informed directly by a CF center about positive screening results and only when sweat testing is possible within the next days. What is Known: • The risk of psychological harm due to false-positive screening results is a longstanding concern. • Satisfactory information about the positive CF screening result seem to reduce the parental stress. What is New: • Parents being informed directly by a CF specialist were more satisfied with the given information and the delay until the final diagnostic testing was shorter. • Our data support the concept that parents should better be informed directly by a CF specialist about positive screening results and only when sweat testing is possible within the next days to reduce parental stress.

Indexed as

Cystic FibrosisFemaleGermanyHumansInfant, NewbornMaleNeonatal ScreeningParentsSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsCystic fibrosisNewborn screeningParental stressPositive screening results

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.