SynthesisBMJ open2019
What's on your keyboard? A systematic review of the contamination of peripheral computer devices in healthcare settings.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence, Virulence Determinants, and Antimicrobial Resistance ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bacterial contamination on mobile phones in the theatre area of a large veterinary hospital.Veterinary record open · 2025Article
- The Key to Success: Replacing Small Keyboards Improves Use and Usability of Hospital Workstations on Wheels.Cureus · 2025Article
- Using adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence level monitoring to identify bacterial reservoirs during two consecutive Enterococcus faecium and Staphylococcus capitis nosocomial infection outbreaks at a neonatal intensive care unit.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2023Article
- Impact of Plastic-Wrap Properties and Cleaning Intervals on the Disinfection of Elevator Buttons.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- UCL MotionInput: Touchless computing interactions in clinical training, radiology and operating theatres.Future healthcare journal · 2022Article
- Temporal variations in bacterial community diversity and composition throughout intensive care unit renovations.Microbiome · 2020Article
- The comparative efficacy of disinfectant wipes on common-use computer keyboards in a veterinary teaching hospital.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2020Article
- Bacterial colonization of handheld devices in a tertiary care setting: a hygiene intervention study.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2019Article
- Contemporary Management of Cleaning and Disinfection Processes for Echocardiographic Equipment and Probes: National Real-world Data from an Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging Survey.Journal of cardiovascular echographyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the extent and type of microbial contamination of computer peripheral devices used in healthcare settings, evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to reduce contamination of these devices and establish the risk of patient and healthcare worker infection from contaminated devices.
designSystematic review
methodsWe searched four online databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase and Scopus for articles reporting primary data collection on contamination of computer-related equipment (including keyboards, mice, laptops and tablets) and/or studies demonstrating the effectiveness of a disinfection technique. Pooling of contamination rates was conducted where possible, and narrative synthesis was used to describe the rates of device contamination, types of bacterial and viral contamination, effectiveness of interventions and any associations between device contamination and human infections.
resultsOf the 4432 records identified, a total of 75 studies involving 2804 computer devices were included. Of these, 50 studies reported contamination of computer-related hardware, and 25 also measured the effects of a decontamination intervention. The overall proportion of contamination ranged from 24% to 100%. The most common microbial contaminants were skin commensals, but also included potential pathogens including methicillin-resistant
conclusionsComputer keyboards and peripheral devices are frequently contaminated; however, our findings do not allow us to draw firm conclusions about their relative impact on the transmission of pathogens or nosocomial infection. Additional studies measuring the incidence of healthcare-acquired infections from computer hardware, the relative risk they pose to healthcare and evidence for effective and practical cleaning methods are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.