Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30852537›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Characterising variation in composition and activation criteria of rapid response and cardiac arrest teams: a survey of Medicare participating hospitals in five American states.

Oscar J L Mitchell, Caroline W Motschwiller, James M Horowitz, Laura E Evans, Vikramjit Mukherjee

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Oscar J L MitchellDepartment of Internal Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York City, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5331-5562
Caroline W MotschwillerDepartment of Internal Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York City, New York, USA.
James M HorowitzDivision of Cardiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York City, New York, USA.
Laura E EvansDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York City, New York, USA.
Vikramjit MukherjeeDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York City, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo characterise the variation in composition, leadership, and activation criteria of rapid response and cardiac arrest teams in five north-eastern states of the USA.

designCross-sectional study consisting of a voluntary 46-question survey of acute care hospitals in north-eastern USA.

settingAcute care hospitals in New York, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Pennsylvania.

participantsSurveys were completed by any member of the rapid response team (RRT) with a working knowledge of team composition and function. Participants were all Medicare-participating acute care hospitals, including teaching and community hospitals as well as hospitals from rural, urban and suburban areas.

resultsOut of 378 hospitals, contacts were identified for 303, and 107 surveys were completed. All but two hospitals had an RRT, 70% of which changed members daily. The most common activation criteria were clinical concern (95%), single vital sign abnormalities (77%) and early warning score (59%). Eighty one per cent of hospitals had a dedicated cardiac arrest team.RRT composition varied widely, with respiratory therapists, critical care nurses, physicians and nurse managers being the most likely to attend (89%, 78%, 64% and 51%, respectively). Consistent presence of critical care physicians was uncommon and both cardiac arrest teams and teams were frequently led by trainee physicians, often without senior supervision.

conclusionsAs the largest study to date in the USA, we have demonstrated wide heterogeneity, rapid team turnover and a lack of senior supervision of RRT and cardiac arrest teams. These factors likely contribute to the mixed results seen in studies of RRTs.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesHeart ArrestHospital Rapid Response TeamHospitalsHumansLeadershipMid-Atlantic RegionNew EnglandOutcome Assessment, Health CarePersonnel, HospitalSurveys and Questionnairesepidemiology

Identifiers

PMID30852537
PMCPMC6429839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.