Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30852534›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Occupational justice and social inclusion in mental illness and HIV: a scoping review protocol.

Clement Nhunzvi, Lisa Langhaug, Edwin Mavindidze, Richard Harding, Roshan Galvaan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Protecting research participants: Has the pendulum swung too far?The British journal of occupational therapy · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Clement NhunzviRehabilitation, University of Zimbabwe, College of Health Sciences, Harare, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID 0000-0001-5804-9817
Lisa LanghaugAfrican Mental Health Research Initiative (AMARI), Department of Psychiatry, University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Edwin MavindidzeOccupational Therapy, Ingutsheni Central Hospital, Bulawayo, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe.
Richard HardingDept of Palliative Care and Policy, Kings College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9653-8689
Roshan GalvaanHealth and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

Wellcome Trust DEL-15-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMental illness and HIV remain prevalent as chronic and stigmatised conditions and a global public health concern. Disability-adjusted life-years due to comorbid neuropsychiatric conditions and HIV are rising. Occupational justice and social inclusion emphasise the importance of equity and the utility of resources and opportunities for all to engage in diverse, healthy and meaningful activities. However, succinct conceptualisation of social inclusion and occupational justice, including the relationship between these concepts is still limited. This hampers their effective utilisation in research and practice. Here, we present our scoping review protocol to appraise literature to describe and explain the state of conceptualisation of occupational justice and social inclusion in relation to mental illness and HIV. We are aiming to review the definitions, current utilisation and relationships between occupational justice and social inclusion to inform further theorisation and practice application. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review protocol follows existing guidelines for scoping reviews in occupational therapy with particular attention on Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) scoping review framework. We iteratively developed a search strategy and carried out our search using the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Academic Search Premier, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Africa-Wide Information, Humanities International Complete, Web of Science, PsychInfo and SocINDEX. To enhance the comprehensiveness of our search and capture all relevant information, we will also search a variety of grey literature sources. Two reviewers will independently screen eligible studies for inclusion. Bibliographic data, abstract content and aspects of the study design and findings will be extracted and thematically analysed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As secondary analysis, this scoping review does not require ethics approval. Results will summarise and disseminate existing research related to occupational justice and social inclusion in mental health and HIV/AIDS care, describing the conceptualisation, relationships between concepts and identifying gaps for further research and practical application. We will disseminate the results through peer-reviewed journals and conferences, targeting clinicians, academics, researchers and policy makers.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsHumansMental DisordersOccupational TherapistsOccupational TherapyResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicSocial JusticeHIVmental disordersoccupational justicescoping review protocolsocial inclusion

Identifiers

PMID30852534
PMCPMC6429853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.