Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30851991›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2019

U.S. Emergency Department Visits Resulting From Nonmedical Use of Pharmaceuticals, 2016.

Andrew I Geller, Deborah Dowell, Maribeth C Lovegrove, Jana K McAninch, Sandra K Goring, Kathleen O Rose, Nina J Weidle, Daniel S Budnitz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Loperamide Overdose.Cureus · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew I GellerDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia.
Deborah DowellNational Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia.
Maribeth C LovegroveDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia.
Jana K McAninchCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Sandra K GoringDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia.
Kathleen O RoseDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia.
Nina J WeidleDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia.
Daniel S BudnitzDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: dbudnitz@cdc.gov.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research · USNational Center for Injury Prevention and Control · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNational data on morbidity from nonmedical use of pharmaceuticals are limited. This study used nationally representative, public health surveillance data to characterize U.S. emergency department visits for acute harms from nonmedical use of pharmaceuticals and to guide prevention efforts.

methodsData collected in 2016 from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System-Cooperative Adverse Drug Event Surveillance project were analyzed in 2018 to calculate national estimates of emergency department visits for harms from nonmedical use of pharmaceuticals.

resultsBased on 5,130 surveillance cases, there were an estimated 358,247 emergency department visits (95% CI=280,675, 435,819) in 2016 for harms from nonmedical use of pharmaceuticals and 41.1% resulted in hospitalization (95% CI=32.3%, 49.8%). One half (50.9%, 95% CI=46.6%, 55.3%) of estimated visits involved patients aged ≤34 years; more than one half of estimated visits also involved non-pharmaceutical substances (52.9%, 95% CI=49.7%, 56.1%), including illicit drugs in 34.1% (95% CI=30.9%, 37.2%) and alcohol in 21.8% (95% CI=19.8%, 23.9%). Overall, benzodiazepines were implicated in 46.9% (95% CI=42.5%, 51.2%) of estimated emergency department visits for nonmedical use of pharmaceuticals but were the only substance implicated in just 6.5% (95% CI=5.1%, 7.9%). Prescription opioids were implicated in 36.2% (95% CI=30.8%, 41.7%) of estimated emergency department visits and were the only substance implicated in 11.3% (95% CI=8.6%, 14.0%).

conclusionsAlthough prescription opioids or benzodiazepines are frequently implicated in emergency department visits for nonmedical use, because other substances and additional pharmaceuticals are most often involved, prescribing clinicians should consider implementing specific screening to address polysubstance use and, when warranted, treatment interventions.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesics, OpioidBenzodiazepinesChildChild, PreschoolDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospitalizationHumansInfantInfant, NewbornAnalgesics, OpioidBenzodiazepines

Identifiers

PMID30851991
PMCPMC6475457
OpenAlexW2922018480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.