ReviewJournal of biomedical optics2019
Optical phantoms for biomedical polarimetry: a review.
Review in Journal of biomedical optics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optical phantoms for the characterization and validation of imaging and spectroscopy: a review.Biophotonics discovery · 2026Review
- Polarimetric analysis of the Alzheimer's pathology in excised mouse brain tissue.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- Probing the Influence of Specular Reflection and Overexposure on Backscattering Mueller Matrix Polarimetry for Tissue Imaging and Sensing.Biosensors · 2025Article
- Depth-resolved imaging in turbid media via Mueller matrix polarimetry.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Mueller matrix analysis of a biologically sourced engineered tissue construct as polarimetric phantom.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
- Evaluating backscattering polarized light imaging microstructural mapping capabilities through neural tissue and analogous phantom imaging.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
- 3D polarization-interference holographic histology for wavelet-based differentiation of the polycrystalline component of biological tissues with different necrotic states. Forensic applications.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
- Complex Spatial Illumination Scheme Optimization of Backscattering Mueller Matrix Polarimetry for Tissue Imaging and Biosensing.Biosensors · 2024Article
- Pulse Feature-Enhanced Classification of Microalgae and Cyanobacteria Using Polarized Light Scattering and Fluorescence Signals.Biosensors · 2024Article
- Effect of matrix properties on transmission and reflectance mode division-of-focal-plane Stokes polarimetry.Journal of biomedical optics · 2023Article
- Influence of hematoxylin and eosin staining on linear birefringence measurement of fibrous tissue structures in polarization microscopy.Journal of biomedical optics · 2023Article
- Impact of corpus callosum fiber tract crossing on polarimetric images of human brain histological sections:Journal of biomedical optics · 2023Article
- Design and characterization of color printed polyurethane films as biomedical phantom layers.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- ImprovedJournal of biomedical optics · 2023Article
- Spatial frequency domain Mueller matrix imaging.Journal of biomedical optics · 2022Article
- Degeneration of Melanin-Containing Structures Observed Longitudinally in the Eyes of SOD1-/- Mice Using Intensity, Polarization, and Spectroscopic OCT.Translational vision science & technology · 2022Article
- Polarization enhanced laparoscope for improved visualization of tissue structural changes associated with peritoneal cancer metastasis.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Birefringent tissue-mimicking phantom for polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography imaging.Journal of biomedical optics · 2022Article
- Diattenuation and retardance signature of plasmonic gold nanorods in turbid media revealed by Mueller matrix polarimetry.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Quantifying optical anisotropy in soft tissue membranes using Mueller matrix imaging.Journal of biomedical optics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Calibration, quantification, and standardization of the polarimetric instrumentation, as well as interpretation and understanding of the obtained data, require the development and use of well-calibrated phantoms and standards. We reviewed the status of tissue phantoms for a variety of applications in polarimetry; more than 500 papers are considered. We divided the phantoms into five groups according to their origin (biological/nonbiological) and fundamental polarimetric properties of retardation, depolarization, and diattenuation. We found that, while biological media are generally depolarizing, retarding, and diattenuating, only one of all the phantoms reviewed incorporated all these properties, and few considered at least combined retardation and depolarization. Samples derived from biological tissue, such as tendon and muscle, remain extremely popular to quickly ascertain a polarimetric system, but do not provide quantifiable results aside from relative direction of their principal optical axis. Microspheres suspensions are the most utilized phantoms for depolarization, and combined with theoretical models can offer true quantification of depolarization or degree of polarization. There is a real paucity of birefringent phantoms despite the retardance being one of the most interesting parameters measurable with polarization techniques. Therefore, future work should be directed at generating truly reliable and repeatable phantoms for this metric determination. Diattenuating phantoms are rare and application-specific. Given that diattenuation is considered to be low in most biological tissues, the lack of such phantoms is seen as less problematic. The heterogeneity of the phantoms reviewed points to a critical need for standardization in this field. Ultimately, all research groups involved in polarimetric studies and instruments development would benefit from sharing a limited set of standardized polarimetric phantoms, as is done earlier in the round robin investigations in ellipsometry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.