Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30850881›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2019

Revision knee complexity classification-RKCC: a common-sense guide for surgeons to support regional clinical networking in revision knee surgery.

J R A Phillips, L Al-Mouazzen, R Morgan-Jones, J R Murray, A J Porteous, A D Toms

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Temporary new implant spacers increase post-reimplantation total knee prosthesis survival after periprosthetic joint infection.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Am I the right surgeon, in the right hospital, with the right equipment and staff to do this operation?Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J R A PhillipsExeter Knee Reconstruction Unit, Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Barrack Road, Exeter, UK. jonphillips@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8945-6511
L Al-MouazzenSouthmead Hospital, Southmead Road, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol, UK.
R Morgan-JonesUniversity Hospital Llandough, Penlan Road, Cardiff, UK.
J R MurraySouthmead Hospital, Southmead Road, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol, UK.
A J PorteousSouthmead Hospital, Southmead Road, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol, UK.
A D TomsExeter Knee Reconstruction Unit, Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Barrack Road, Exeter, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is considerable variation in practice throughout Europe in both the services provided and in the outcomes of Revision Knee Surgery. In the UK, a recent report published called get it right first time (GIRFT) aims to improve patient outcomes through providing high quality, cost-effective care, and reducing complications. This has led to the development of a classification system that attempts to classify the complexity of revision knee surgery, aiming to encourage and support regional clinical networking.

methodsThe revision knee classification system (RKCC) incorporates not only complexity, but also patient factors, the presence of infection, the integrity of the extensor mechanism, and the soft tissues. It then provides guidance for clinical network discussion. Reliability and reproducibility testing have been performed to establish the inter- and intra-observer variabilities using this classification.

resultsGood correlation between first attempt non-expert and experts, good intra-observer variability of non-expert, and an excellent correlation between second attempt non-expert and experts has been achieved. This supports the use of RKCC by both inexperienced and experienced surgeons.

conclusionsThe revision knee complexity classification has been proposed that offers a common-sense approach to recognize the increasing complexity in revision TKR cases. It provides a methodological assessment of revision knee cases and support regional clinical networking and triage of appropriate cases to revision units or specialist centres. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Expert opinion, Level V.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeCongresses as TopicEuropeHumansKnee JointObserver VariationReoperationReproducibility of ResultsSurgeons

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.