ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2019
Revision knee complexity classification-RKCC: a common-sense guide for surgeons to support regional clinical networking in revision knee surgery.
Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reduced workload demand with handheld robotic-assisted revision knee arthroplasty: A multi-centre NASA Task Load Index analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Bone defects in knee revision arthroplasty-a therapy-oriented classification.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Article
- Review
- "Is every revision the same?" definition of complexity in knee revision surgery.International orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Development of the Revision Hip Complexity Classification using a modified Delphi technique.Bone & joint open · 2022Article
- Revision total knee replacement case-mix at a major revision centre.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2022Article
- Temporary new implant spacers increase post-reimplantation total knee prosthesis survival after periprosthetic joint infection.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021Article
- The revision partial knee classification system: understanding the causative pathology and magnitude of further surgery following partial knee arthroplasty.Bone & joint open · 2021Article
- Improving outcomes in acute and chronic periprosthetic hip and knee joint infection with a multidisciplinary approach.Bone & joint open · 2021Article
- Diagnosis and management of the infected total knee replacement: a practical surgical guide.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2021Article
- Am I the right surgeon, in the right hospital, with the right equipment and staff to do this operation?Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThere is considerable variation in practice throughout Europe in both the services provided and in the outcomes of Revision Knee Surgery. In the UK, a recent report published called get it right first time (GIRFT) aims to improve patient outcomes through providing high quality, cost-effective care, and reducing complications. This has led to the development of a classification system that attempts to classify the complexity of revision knee surgery, aiming to encourage and support regional clinical networking.
methodsThe revision knee classification system (RKCC) incorporates not only complexity, but also patient factors, the presence of infection, the integrity of the extensor mechanism, and the soft tissues. It then provides guidance for clinical network discussion. Reliability and reproducibility testing have been performed to establish the inter- and intra-observer variabilities using this classification.
resultsGood correlation between first attempt non-expert and experts, good intra-observer variability of non-expert, and an excellent correlation between second attempt non-expert and experts has been achieved. This supports the use of RKCC by both inexperienced and experienced surgeons.
conclusionsThe revision knee complexity classification has been proposed that offers a common-sense approach to recognize the increasing complexity in revision TKR cases. It provides a methodological assessment of revision knee cases and support regional clinical networking and triage of appropriate cases to revision units or specialist centres. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Expert opinion, Level V.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30850881What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.