Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30850732›Full record

ArticleCell death and differentiation2019

TAK1 suppresses RIPK1-dependent cell death and is associated with disease progression in melanoma.

Biswajit Podder, Cristiano Guttà, Jan Rožanc, Elke Gerlach, Maria Feoktistova, Diana Panayotova-Dimitrova, Leonidas G Alexopoulos, Martin Leverkus, Markus Rehm

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death and differentiation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. MLKL deficiency in BrafCell death & disease · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Biswajit PodderInstitute of Cell Biology and Immunology, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Cristiano GuttàInstitute of Cell Biology and Immunology, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Jan RožancProtATonce Ltd, Science Park Demokritos, Athens, Greece.
Elke GerlachInstitute of Cell Biology and Immunology, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Maria FeoktistovaDepartment for Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital Aachen, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Diana Panayotova-DimitrovaDepartment for Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital Aachen, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Leonidas G AlexopoulosProtATonce Ltd, Science Park Demokritos, Athens, Greece.
Martin Leverkus *Department for Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital Aachen, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Markus Rehm *Institute of Cell Biology and Immunology, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany. markus.morrison@izi.uni-stuttgart.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6149-9261
University of Stuttgart · DEUniversitätsklinikum Aachen · DENational Centre of Scientific Research "Demokritos" · GRNational Technical University of Athens · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melanoma cells are highly resistant to conventional genotoxic agents, and BRAFV600/MEK-targeted therapies as well as immunotherapies frequently remain inefficient. Alternative means to treat melanoma, in particular through the induction of programmed cell death modalities such as apoptosis or necroptosis, therefore still need to be explored. Here, we report that melanoma cell lines expressing notable amounts of RIPK1, RIPK3 and MLKL, the key players of necroptosis signal transduction, fail to execute necroptotic cell death. Interestingly, the activity of transforming growth factor β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) appears to prevent RIPK1 from contributing to cell death induction, since TAK1 inhibition by (5Z)-7-Oxozeaenol, deletion of MAP3K7 or the expression of inactive TAK1 were sufficient to sensitize melanoma cells to RIPK1-dependent cell death in response to TNFα or TRAIL based combination treatments. However, cell death was executed exclusively by apoptosis, even when RIPK3 expression was high. In addition, TAK1 inhibitor (5Z)-7-Oxozeaenol suppressed intrinsic or treatment-induced pro-survival signaling as well as the secretion of cytokines and soluble factors associated with melanoma disease progression. Correspondingly, elevated expression of TAK1 correlates with reduced disease free survival in patients diagnosed with primary melanoma. Overall, our results therefore demonstrate that TAK1 suppresses the susceptibility to RIPK1-dependent cell death and that high expression of TAK1 indicates an increased risk for disease progression in melanoma.

Indexed as

Antimetabolites, AntineoplasticCell DeathCell Line, TumorDecitabineDisease ProgressionHumansLactonesMAP Kinase Kinase Kinase 7MAP Kinase Kinase KinasesMelanomaNecroptosisReceptor-Interacting Protein Serine-Threonine KinasesResorcinolsSignal TransductionTransfectionZearalenone7-oxozeanolAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticDecitabineLactonesMAP Kinase Kinase Kinase 7MAP Kinase Kinase KinasesReceptor-Interacting Protein Serine-Threonine KinasesResorcinolsRIPK1 protein, humanRIPK3 protein, humanZearalenone

Identifiers

PMID30850732
PMCPMC7224222
OpenAlexW2921861660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.