Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30850514›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2019

Prediction of Choice from Competing Mechanosensory and Choice-Memory Cues during Active Tactile Decision Making.

Dario Campagner, Mathew H Evans, Katarina Chlebikova, Andrea Colins-Rodriguez, Michaela S E Loft, Sarah Fox, David Pettifer, Mark D Humphries, Karel Svoboda, Rasmus S Petersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dario CampagnerDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, M13 9PT Manchester, United Kingdom, and.ORCID 0000-0001-9016-4575
Mathew H EvansDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, M13 9PT Manchester, United Kingdom, and.ORCID 0000-0003-4619-9070
Katarina ChlebikovaDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, M13 9PT Manchester, United Kingdom, and.
Andrea Colins-RodriguezDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, M13 9PT Manchester, United Kingdom, and.ORCID 0000-0003-3584-2251
Michaela S E LoftDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, M13 9PT Manchester, United Kingdom, and.ORCID 0000-0002-7700-0557
Sarah FoxDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, M13 9PT Manchester, United Kingdom, and.
David PettiferDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, M13 9PT Manchester, United Kingdom, and.
Mark D HumphriesDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, M13 9PT Manchester, United Kingdom, and.ORCID 0000-0002-1906-2581
Karel SvobodaJanelia Research Campus, HHMI, Ashburn, VA, 20147.
Rasmus S PetersenDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, M13 9PT Manchester, United Kingdom, and r.petersen@manchester.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L007282/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/ P021603/1Howard Hughes Medical InstituteMedical Research Council MR/J008648/1Medical Research Council MR/J008648/2Medical Research Council MR/L01064X7/1Medical Research Council MR/P005659/1Medical Research Council MR/P005659/2Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 097820/Z/11/B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perceptual decision making is an active process where animals move their sense organs to extract task-relevant information. To investigate how the brain translates sensory input into decisions during active sensation, we developed a mouse active touch task where the mechanosensory input can be precisely measured and that challenges animals to use multiple mechanosensory cues. Male mice were trained to localize a pole using a single whisker and to report their decision by selecting one of three choices. Using high-speed imaging and machine vision, we estimated whisker-object mechanical forces at millisecond resolution. Mice solved the task by a sensory-motor strategy where both the strength and direction of whisker bending were informative cues to pole location. We found competing influences of immediate sensory input and choice memory on mouse choice. On correct trials, choice could be predicted from the direction and strength of whisker bending, but not from previous choice. In contrast, on error trials, choice could be predicted from previous choice but not from whisker bending. This study shows that animal choices during active tactile decision making can be predicted from mechanosensory and choice-memory signals, and provides a new task well suited for the future study of the neural basis of active perceptual decisions.

Indexed as

CuesDecision MakingMemoryTouchTouch PerceptionAnimalsMaleMice, Inbred C57BLModels, NeurologicalPhysical StimulationVibrissaebehaviorcomputational modelingdecision makingmousesensory-motor integrationwhisker system

Identifiers

PMID30850514
PMCPMC6520515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.