Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30850431›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2019

Potential for Microbially Mediated Natural Attenuation of Diluted Bitumen on the Coast of British Columbia (Canada).

Lars Schreiber, Nathalie Fortin, Julien Tremblay, Jessica Wasserscheid, Miria Elias, Jennifer Mason, Sylvie Sanschagrin, Susan Cobanli, Thomas King, Kenneth Lee and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Research progress in bioremediation of petroleum pollution.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lars SchreiberEnergy, Mining and Environment Research Center, National Research Council Canada, Montreal, Quebec, Canada lars.schreiber@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.
Nathalie FortinEnergy, Mining and Environment Research Center, National Research Council Canada, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Julien TremblayEnergy, Mining and Environment Research Center, National Research Council Canada, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Jessica WasserscheidEnergy, Mining and Environment Research Center, National Research Council Canada, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Miria EliasEnergy, Mining and Environment Research Center, National Research Council Canada, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Jennifer MasonCentre for Offshore Oil, Gas and Energy Research, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Sylvie SanschagrinEnergy, Mining and Environment Research Center, National Research Council Canada, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Susan CobanliCentre for Offshore Oil, Gas and Energy Research, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Thomas KingCentre for Offshore Oil, Gas and Energy Research, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Kenneth LeeEcosystem and Oceans Sector, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Charles W GreerEnergy, Mining and Environment Research Center, National Research Council Canada, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Western Canada produces large amounts of bitumen, a heavy, highly weathered crude oil. Douglas Channel and Hecate Strait on the coast of British Columbia are two water bodies that may be impacted by a proposed pipeline and marine shipping route for diluted bitumen (dilbit). This study investigated the potential of microbial communities from these waters to mitigate the impacts of a potential dilbit spill. Microcosm experiments were set up with water samples representing different seasons, years, sampling stations, and dilbit blends. While the alkane fraction of the tested dilbit blends was almost completely degraded after 28 days, the majority of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) remained. The addition of the dispersant Corexit 9500A most often had either no effect or an enhancing effect on dilbit degradation. Dilbit-degrading microbial communities were highly variable between seasons, years, and stations, with dilbit type having little impact on community trajectories. Potential oil-degrading genera showed a clear succession pattern and were for the most part recruited from the "rare biosphere." At the community level, dispersant appeared to stimulate an accelerated enrichment of genera typically associated with hydrocarbon degradation, even in dilbit-free controls. This suggests that dispersant-induced growth of hydrocarbon degraders (and not only increased bioavailability of oil-associated hydrocarbons) contributes to the degradation-enhancing effect previously reported for Corexit 9500A.

Indexed as

BacteriaBiodegradation, EnvironmentalBritish ColumbiaHydrocarbonsPetroleum PollutionSeawaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalasphaltHydrocarbonsWater Pollutants, ChemicalCorexitdiluted bitumendispersantDouglas ChannelHecate Straitmetagenomicsmicrobial communitiesmicrobial ecologyoil degradationoil spill

Identifiers

PMID30850431
PMCPMC6498151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.