ArticleBMJ open2019
Training non-physician anaesthetists in sub-Saharan Africa: a qualitative investigation of providers' perspectives.
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Assessing the impact of anaesthetic and surgical task-shifting globally: a systematic literature review.Health policy and planning · 2023Pooled it
- Article
- Factors behind high caesarean section in Bangladesh: insight from a systematic literature review and meta-synthesis.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Anaesthesiologists' perspectives of the need for nurse anaesthetists in South Africa.Curationis · 2025Article
- Non-physician anaesthesia providers' perspectives on task sharing practices in Zambia and Somaliland: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Online interviews for qualitative health research in Africa: a scoping review.International health · 2024Article
- Assessment of anaesthesia workforce capacity in district and tehsil (taluka) hospitals in Sindh province of Pakistan: a survey.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Priorities for content for a short-course on postoperative care relevant for low- and middle-income countries: an e-Delphi process with training facilitators.Anaesthesia · 2022Article
- Evaluating the effect of interventions for strengthening non-physician anesthetists' education in Ethiopia: a pre- and post-evaluation study.BMC medical education · 2021Article
- Awareness and its associated factors towards anesthesia and anesthetists' among elective surgical patients in Debre Tabor Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, North Central Ethiopia 2021: Cross-sectional study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection:2019
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo explore the views of non-physician anaesthesia providers (NPAPs) and their colleagues regarding the effectiveness of NPAP training programmes in three contrasting sub-Saharan African countries.
designThis was a qualitative exploratory descriptive study. Semistructured interviews were conducted online, recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically using NVivo.
settingParticipants' homes or workplaces in Sierra Leone, Somaliland and Uganda.
participants15 NPAPs, physician anaesthetists and surgeons working in the countries concerned.
resultsThree major themes were identified: (1) discrepancy between urban training and rural practice, (2) prominent development of attitudes outside the curricular set during training, including approaches to learning and clinical responsibility and (3) the importance of interprofessional relationships developed during training for later practice.
conclusionsAnaesthesia providers in different cadres and very different country contexts in sub-Saharan Africa describe common themes in training which appear to be significant for their later practice. Not all these issues are explicitly planned for in current training programmes, although they are important in the view of providers. Subsequent programme development should consider these themes with a view to enhancing the safety and quality of anaesthesia practice in this context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.