ReviewBMJ open2019
Top research priorities in liver and gallbladder disorders in the UK.
Review in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nutritional supplementation for nonalcohol-related fatty liver disease: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Lifestyle modifications for nonalcohol-related fatty liver disease: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Treatment for bleeding oesophageal varices in people with decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Primary prevention of variceal bleeding in people with oesophageal varices due to liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Secondary prevention of variceal bleeding in adults with previous oesophageal variceal bleeding due to decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Quality of life in primary sclerosing cholangitis: a systematic review.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2021Pooled it
- Treatment for ascites in adults with decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in people with liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Induction immunosuppression in adults undergoing liver transplantation: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Antibiotic treatment for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in people with decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Treatment for hepatorenal syndrome in people with decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Establishing Research Priorities in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Data-driven and Stakeholder-informed Approach.Oman medical journal · 2025Article
- Priorities for Research into the Impact of Canine Surgical Sterilisation Programmes for Free-Roaming Dogs: An International Priority Setting Partnership.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThere is a mismatch between research questions considered important by patients, carers and healthcare professionals and the research performed in many fields of medicine. The non-alcohol-related liver and gallbladder disorders priority setting partnership was established to identify the top research priorities in the prevention, diagnostic and treatment of gallbladder disorders and liver disorders not covered by the James-Lind Alliance (JLA) alcohol-related liver disease priority setting partnership.
designThe methods broadly followed the principles of the JLA guidebook. The one major deviation from the JLA methodology was the final step of identifying priorities: instead of prioritisation by group discussions at a consensus workshop involving stakeholders, the prioritisation was achieved by a modified Delphi consensus process.
resultsA total of 428 unique valid diagnostic or treatment research questions were identified. A literature review established that none of these questions were considered 'answered' that is, high-quality systematic reviews suggest that further research is not required on the topic. The Delphi panel achieved consensus (at least 80% Delphi panel members agreed) that a research question was a top research priority for six questions. Four additional research questions with highest proportion of Delphi panel members ranking the question as highly important were added to constitute the top 10 research priorities.
conclusionsA priority setting process involving patients, carers and healthcare professionals has been used to identify the top 10priority areas for research related to liver and gallbladder disorders. Basic, translational, clinical and public health research are required to address these uncertainties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.