Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30850385›Full record

SynthesisBlood advances2019

Vitamin K for reversal of excessive vitamin K antagonist anticoagulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rasha Khatib, Maja Ludwikowska, Daniel M Witt, Jack Ansell, Nathan P Clark, Anne Holbrook, Wojtek Wiercioch, Holger Schünemann, Robby Nieuwlaat

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Blood advances, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Reversal of Anticoagulants in Critical Care.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rasha KhatibDepartment of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Maja LudwikowskaEvidence Prime Inc, Cracow, Poland.
Daniel M WittDepartment of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City, UT.
Jack AnsellHofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY.
Nathan P ClarkClinical Pharmacy Anticoagulation and Anemia Service, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO; and.
Anne HolbrookDivision of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, Department of Medicine, and.
Wojtek WierciochDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Holger SchünemannDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Robby NieuwlaatDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients receiving vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) with an international normalized ratio (INR) between 4.5 and 10 are at increased risk of bleeding. We systematically reviewed the literature to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of administering vitamin K in patients receiving VKA therapy with INR between 4.5 and 10 and without bleeding. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials in April 2018. Search strategy included terms vitamin K administration and VKA-related terms. Reference lists of relevant studies were reviewed, and experts in the field were contacted for relevant papers. Two investigators independently screened and collected data. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated, and certainty of the evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Six studies (1074 participants) were included in the review and meta-analyses. Pooled estimates indicate a nonsignificant increased risk of mortality (RR = 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-2.47), bleeding (RR = 2.24; 95% CI, 0.81-7.27), and thromboembolism (RR = 1.29; 95% CI, 0.35-4.78) for vitamin K administration, with moderate certainty of the evidence resulting from serious imprecision as CIs included potential for benefit and harm. Patients receiving vitamin K had a nonsignificant increase in the likelihood of reaching goal INR (1.95; 95% CI, 0.88-4.33), with very low certainty of the evidence resulting from serious risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision. Our findings indicate that patients on VKA therapy who have an INR between 4.5 and 10.0 without bleeding are not likely to benefit from vitamin K administration in addition to temporary VKA cessation.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsHemorrhageHumansInternational Normalized RatioRisk AssessmentVitamin KVitamin K DeficiencyAnticoagulantsVitamin K

Identifiers

PMID30850385
PMCPMC6418499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.