Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30850311›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine2019

"Is It Really Confidential?" A Content Analysis of Online Information About Sexual and Reproductive Health Services for Adolescents.

Riley J Steiner, Sanjana Pampati, Catherine N Rasberry, Nicole Liddon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Confidentiality Matters but How Do We Improve Implementation in Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health Care?The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Riley J SteinerCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Adolescent and School Health, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: rsteiner@cdc.gov.
Sanjana PampatiOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE), Atlanta, Georgia.
Catherine N RasberryCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Adolescent and School Health, Atlanta, Georgia.
Nicole LiddonCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Adolescent and School Health, Atlanta, Georgia.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USOak Ridge Associated Universities · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMany young people are not aware of their rights to confidential sexual and reproductive health (SRH) care. Given that online health information seeking is common among adolescents, we examined how health education Web content about SRH for young people addresses confidentiality.

methodsIn Spring 2017, we conducted Google keyword searches (e.g., "teens" and "sex education") to identify health promotion Web sites operated by public health/medical organizations in the United States and providing original content about SRH for adolescents/young adults. Thirty-two Web sites met inclusion criteria. We uploaded Web site PDFs to qualitative analysis software to identify confidentiality-related content and conduct thematic analysis of the 29 Web sites with confidentiality content.

resultsSexually transmitted infection testing and contraception were the SRH services most commonly described as confidential. Clear and comprehensive definitions of confidentiality were lacking; Web sites typically described confidentiality in relation to legal rights to receive care without parental consent or notification. Few mentioned the importance of time alone with a medical provider. Only half of the Web sites described potential inadvertent breaches of confidentiality associated with billing and even fewer described other restrictions to confidentiality practices (e.g., mandatory reporting laws). Although many Web sites recommended that adolescents verify confidentiality, guidance for doing so was not routinely provided. Information about confidentiality often encouraged adolescents to communicate with parents.

conclusionsThere is a need to provide comprehensive information, assurances, and resources about confidentiality practices while also addressing limitations to confidentiality in a way that does not create an undue burden on adolescents or reinforce and exacerbate confidentiality concerns.

Indexed as

Information Seeking BehaviorInternetReproductive Health ServicesSexual HealthAdolescentConfidentialityContraceptionFemaleHumansMaleParental ConsentSexually Transmitted DiseasesUnited StatesYoung AdultConfidentialityContraceptionSexually transmitted infections

Identifiers

PMID30850311
PMCPMC9125409
OpenAlexW2921769049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.