ArticleBiophysical journal2019
A Bidomain Model for Lens Microcirculation.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Glymphatic Clearance in the Optic Nerve: A Multidomain Electro-Osmostic Model.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Current Flow in Nerves and Mitochondria: An Electro-Osmotic Approach.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Oxidative Stress and Cataract Formation: Evaluating the Efficacy of Antioxidant Therapies.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- Setting Boundaries for Statistical Mechanics.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Insights into the biochemical and biophysical mechanisms mediating the longevity of the transparent optics of the eye lens.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2022Review
- Connexin Gap Junctions and Hemichannels in Modulating Lens Redox Homeostasis and Oxidative Stress in Cataractogenesis.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- A tridomain model for potassium clearance in optic nerve of Necturus.Biophysical journal · 2021Article
- Molecular Mean-Field Theory of Ionic Solutions: A Poisson-Nernst-Planck-Bikerman Model.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There exists a large body of research on the lens of the mammalian eye over the past several decades. The objective of this work is to provide a link between the most recent computational models and some of the pioneering work in the 1970s and 80s. We introduce a general nonelectroneutral model to study the microcirculation in the lens of the eye. It describes the steady-state relationships among ion fluxes, between water flow and electric field inside cells, and in the narrow extracellular spaces between cells in the lens. Using asymptotic analysis, we derive a simplified model based on physiological data and compare our results with those in the literature. We show that our simplified model can be reduced further to the first-generation models, whereas our full model is consistent with the most recent computational models. In addition, our simplified model captures in its equations the main features of the full computational models. Our results serve as a useful link intermediate between the computational models and the first-generation analytical models. Simplified models of this sort may be particularly helpful as the roles of similar osmotic pumps of microcirculation are examined in other tissues with narrow extracellular spaces, such as cardiac and skeletal muscle, liver, kidney, epithelia in general, and the narrow extracellular spaces of the central nervous system, the "brain." Simplified models may reveal the general functional plan of these systems before full computational models become feasible and specific.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.