Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30850001›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2019

Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for Cardiogenic Shock: State of the Art.

Ludhmila Abrahao Hajjar, Jean-Louis Teboul

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07175948 (Outcome of Different Clinical Phenotypes of Myocarditis in Children Admitted to Assiut University Children Hospital), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07175948 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Outcome of Different Clinical Phenotypes of Myocarditis in Children Admitted to Assiut University Children Hospital

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsMyocarditis, Myocarditis AcuteArmsStandard Medical Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Surgeon's Role in Cardiogenic Shock.Current heart failure reports · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ludhmila Abrahao HajjarDepartment of Cardiopneumology, Instituto do Coracao, Universidade de São Paulo, Hospital SirioLibanes, São Paulo, Brazil. ludhmila@usp.br.
Jean-Louis TeboulService de Reánimation Médicale, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Universite Paris-Sud, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2019. Other selected articles can be found online at https://www.biomedcentral.com/collections/annualupdate2019 . Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from http://www.springer.com/series/8901 .

Indexed as

Assisted CirculationHemodynamicsHumansIntra-Aortic Balloon PumpingReview Literature as TopicShock, CardiogenicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID30850001
PMCPMC6408785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.